Electron and Proton Collision (relativity)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy (E), kinetic energy (K), and momentum (p) for an electron and a proton in different reference frames, particularly when the electron is accelerated through a potential of 10^9V and the proton is moving at 0.9c. The initial calculations for the electron yield E=10000.53 MeV and K=10000.02 MeV, while for the proton, E=2152 MeV and K=1212.3 MeV, though some values were corrected for accuracy. The challenge arises when trying to find the electron's properties from the proton's frame, where the velocity addition formula leads to confusion about the electron reaching the speed of light, indicating a need for careful application of Lorentz transformations. Ultimately, the participants refine their calculations and confirm the use of the momentum four-vector for accurate results in relativistic contexts. The discussion emphasizes the complexities of relativistic physics and the importance of precision in calculations.
khfrekek92
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated through a potential of 10^9V to the right. A proton is heading to the left towards the electron at .9c.
Find E,K,p for the electron and proton from the rest frame, and from each others frames.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since the potential is 10^9V, the kinetic energy of the electron is K=10,000MeV, and the rest mass is mc^2=.51099MeV. So E=10000.51 MeV.

Using E=γmc^2, I get γ=19570.9, and β=.999999999

Which gives me values of E=10000.53 MeV, K=10000.02 MeV, and p=E/c=10000.53 MeV/c.


For the proton, I do similar math to get E=2152MeV, K=1212.3 MeV and p=2152 MeV/c.

Now to find the E,K,p of the electron from the reference from of the PROTON, I use the combination of velocities equation u'=-ve-vp/(1+vevp/c^2) and I always get the speed of the electron u'=c. How do I get around this? if u=c, then λ=∞, and all the energies and momenta are infinite.. :( Am I doing something wrong? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
khfrekek92 said:

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated through a potential of 10^9V to the right. A proton is heading to the left towards the electron at .9c.
Find E,K,p for the electron and proton from the rest frame, and from each others frames.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since the potential is 10^9V, the kinetic energy of the electron is K=10,000MeV, and the rest mass is mc^2=.51099MeV. So E=10000.51 MeV.

Using E=γmc^2, I get γ=19570.9, and β=.999999999

Which gives me values of E=10000.53 MeV, K=10000.02 MeV, and p=E/c=10000.53 MeV/c.
As I mentioned in the other thread, you're off by a factor of 10 for K. Note you already had K and E. You didn't need to recalculate them after you found γ.

For the proton, I do similar math to get E=2152MeV, K=1212.3 MeV and p=2152 MeV/c.
E and K are right, though you should watch the sig figs. The momentum isn't correct though. The electron was ultrarelativistic, so you can use the approximation that it's massless and use E=p/c. That's not true for the proton.

Now to find the E,K,p of the electron from the reference from of the PROTON, I use the combination of velocities equation u'=-ve-vp/(1+vevp/c^2) and I always get the speed of the electron u'=c. How do I get around this? if u=c, then λ=∞, and all the energies and momenta are infinite.. :( Am I doing something wrong? :(
Are you familiar with the Lorentz transformations?
 
Okay I fixed all that, and got B=.9999999 for the electron (Sorry I decided to start a thread with the entire problem.. But thank you so much for all your help!)

And for the proton, I'm guessing the energies are so much higher just due to the fact that it is more massive than the electron? And I don't know how I missed this but p should be: p=Eβ/c, correct? So p=1936.8 MeV/c!

And I have seen lorentz transforms before, is that what I should be using here? So the momentum four-vector (in this case only has 2 dimensions) would be:
p=(E/c,p_x) And I would multiply it by:
(γ, -βγ)
(-βγ, γ)
to get:
(Eγ/c-βγp_x/c)
(-βγE/c+p_x)

Or is that wrong? I'm not quite sure how to use it for this.. :/
 
I think I got it! This time (with the new value for the speed of the electron that you helped me with) I got an actual value for u'=.999999995c which makes γ=9746.48. Then I just used:
E=γmc^2=4980.35 MeV
K=(γ-1)mc^2=4979.84 MeV
p=βE/c=4980.35 MeV/c

Then it would be the exact same from the ELECTRONS reference frame, but with a slightly lower value for u'

Are these correct?
 
Last edited:
For which particle are those quantities and in which frame?
 
Those quantities of E,K, and p are for the electron, from the protons frame of reference.
 
Hmm, I get different results.
 
khfrekek92 said:
Okay I fixed all that, and got B=.9999999 for the electron (Sorry I decided to start a thread with the entire problem.. But thank you so much for all your help!)

And for the proton, I'm guessing the energies are so much higher just due to the fact that it is more massive than the electron? And I don't know how I missed this but p should be: p=Eβ/c, correct? So p=1936.8 MeV/c!
Yes, this matches what I got.

And I have seen lorentz transforms before, is that what I should be using here? So the momentum four-vector (in this case only has 2 dimensions) would be:
p=(E/c,p_x) And I would multiply it by:
(γ, -βγ)
(-βγ, γ)
to get:
(Eγ/c-βγp_x/c)
(-βγE/c+p_x)

Or is that wrong? I'm not quite sure how to use it for this.. :/
Yes, this would work.
 
Awesome! I think I've got it now. Thank you so much for your help Vela; I really appreciate it!
 
  • #10
Just thought I'd mention...
khfrekek92 said:
I think I got it! This time (with the new value for the speed of the electron that you helped me with) I got an actual value for u'=.999999995c which makes γ=9746.48. Then I just used:
E=γmc^2=4980.35 MeV
K=(γ-1)mc^2=4979.84 MeV
p=βE/c=4980.35 MeV/c

Then it would be the exact same from the ELECTRONS reference frame, but with a slightly lower value for u'

Are these correct?
I assume you found u' using the velocity-addition formula. Your method is probably fine, but when the speeds get this close to c, even a small change can cause the value of γ to change wildly. Your answers are probably off just because of rounding errors.
 
  • #11
vela said:
I assume you found u' using the velocity-addition formula. Your method is probably fine, but when the speeds get this close to c, even a small change can cause the value of γ to change wildly. Your answers are probably off just because of rounding errors.

Yeah I did use the velocity addition formula and I noticed the huge changes for the smallest errors; I think it should be alright for this problem though (hopefully,) the next part of it definitely needs lorentz transform (find frame where momenta are equal.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K