Electron transition notation should be simple

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between two types of electron transition notations used in atomic physics. The first notation, which includes transitions like 2-1 and 3-1, is compared to the second notation, which uses terms such as 3P0-3P1 and 3P0-3P2. The user identifies that 3P0 corresponds to the ground state (n=1) for the Br IV ion, while 3P1 corresponds to n=2. Consequently, the transition 2-1 aligns with the transition 3P1-3P0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic physics terminology, specifically electron states and orbitals.
  • Familiarity with transition notation in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of the NIST atomic data for ionized elements.
  • Basic grasp of electron configuration and energy levels.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the NIST Atomic Spectra Database for detailed energy levels of various ions.
  • Study the principles of electron transitions in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about term symbols and their significance in atomic physics.
  • Explore the differences between various transition notations in atomic and molecular physics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in atomic physics, as well as students and researchers looking to understand electron transition notations and their applications in spectroscopy.

elegysix
Messages
404
Reaction score
15
Alright, so I am trying to make sense of this notation:
From one source I have the transition rates notated such as
Transition:
2-1, 3-1, 3-2, etc
and the source to which I want to compare uses the notation
Transition:
3P0-3P1,
3P0-3P2,
3P0-1D2, etc.

How are these related? How can I tell what corresponds to n=1,2,3 etc?

Any help is greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have figured it out. Please correct me if this is not the case.
If I look at NIST's level data for the ion of interest (Br IV), I can see that 3P0 is the ground state (n=1), right? And then 3P1 should be n=2.
Therefore the 2-1 transition would correspond to 3P1- 3P0, correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K