Electrons escaping a metal surface

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Homework Statement
Electrons in a semi-infinite slab (z < 0) of metal behave as an ideal non-relativistic Fermi gas. They escape the surface if ##p_z^2/(2m) > E_F + V##, where ##E_F## is the Fermi energy and ##V## is a potential barrier - what is the current density of escaping electrons? Assume ##E_F \gg k_B T## and ##V \gg k_B T##.
Relevant Equations
N/A
In the low temperature limit ##\mu \approx E_F## and the Fermi-Dirac distribution is ##n(E) \approx g(E)/(e^{\beta(E-E_F)}+1)##. An escaping electron contributes ##\Delta j_z = -ev_z = -ep_z/m## to the current density. How can I calculate the rate that electrons escape at? I can't see how to relate ##p_z## to the Fermi-Dirac distribution (apart from ##E = p^2/(2m) = (p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2)/(2m)##, in which case I don't know what to say about the transverse component of the momentum).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
How can I calculate the rate that electrons escape at?

##g(E) \large \frac{dE}{e^{\beta(E-E_F)}+1}## gives the number density of electrons with energy between ##E## and ##E + dE##.

In terms of momentum, verify that the number density of electrons with momentum in the range ##(p_x, p_y, p_z)## to ##(p_x+dp_x, p_y+dp_y, p_z + dp_z)## is $$\frac{2}{h^3} \frac{dp_x dp_y dp_z}{e^{\beta[(p_x^2+p_y^2+p_z^2)/(2m)-E_F]}+1}$$ Use this to set up an integral that gives the rate ##R## at which electrons will escape from a unit area of the surface of the metal. $$R = \int_{??}^\infty dp_z \int_{-\infty}^\infty dp_y\int_{-\infty}^\infty dp_x \rm {\,[\, integrand \,\, left \,\, for \,\, you \, :) \,]}$$
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Cheers. Where does the factor 2 come from? I figured that if the (momentum) phase space volume of a state is ##h^3##, then ##g(E) dE \sim d^3 p / h^3##.

Then I thought about a section of the metal with small surface area ##dA##. In time ##dt##, electrons with velocities between ##v_z## and ##v_z + dv_z## reach the surface if they are within a depth ##v_z dt##, i.e. within a volume ##(p_z/m) dt dA##. There are ##dn (p_z/m) dt dA## such electrons, where ##dn = dn(p_x,p_y,p_z)## is the number density of electrons given above. So the rate of escape per unit area, given the restriction that only ##p_z > \sqrt{2m(E_F + V)}## can escape, is \begin{align*}
R = \frac{2}{h^3 m} \int_{\sqrt{2m(E_F + V)}}^{\infty} dp_z \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp_y \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp_x \ \frac{p_z}{e^{\beta(p^2/(2m) - E_F)} + 1}
\end{align*}Does that look right to you?
 
Last edited:
ergospherical said:
Cheers. Where does the factor 2 come from? I figured that if the (momentum) phase space volume of a state is ##h^3##, then ##g(E) dE \sim d^3 p / h^3##.
Electron spin allows two electrons to be in each momentum state. This is easy to forget.

ergospherical said:
Then I thought about a section of the metal with small surface area ##dA##. In time ##dt##, electrons with velocities between ##v_z## and ##v_z + dv_z## reach the surface if they are within a depth ##v_z dt##, i.e. within a volume ##(p_z/m) dt dA##. There are ##dn (p_z/m) dt dA## such electrons, where ##dn = dn(p_x,p_y,p_z)## is the number density of electrons given above. So the rate of escape per unit area, given the restriction that only ##p_z > \sqrt{2m(E_F + V)}## can escape, is \begin{align*}
R = \frac{2}{h^3 m} \int_{\sqrt{2m(E_F + V)}}^{\infty} dp_z \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp_y \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp_x \ \frac{p_z}{e^{\beta(p^2/(2m) - E_F)} + 1}
\end{align*}Does that look right to you?
Yes. Very nice.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top