Electrostatic E Fields - Possible/Impossible

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bangkokphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatic Fields
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical conditions for electric fields, specifically focusing on the implications of the curl of the electric field and the physical realizability of charge distributions. Participants explore whether an electric field can be mathematically valid under certain conditions and the relationship between electric fields and potential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the curl of an electric field must be zero for it to be considered a possible electric field, referencing the relationship between electric fields and potential functions.
  • Others propose that it is conceivable to have a charge distribution that approaches infinity while still resulting in a convergent electric field at certain points.
  • A participant questions whether an electric field can be mathematically possible with a non-zero curl and whether it can be impossible with a zero curl.
  • One participant states that the electric field is the gradient of the electric potential field, not the charge distribution, suggesting a distinction in definitions.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of singularities in the curl of the electric field, providing an example of a field with zero curl everywhere except at a singular point, where it becomes undefined.
  • Discussion includes a note on electrodynamics, mentioning that Faraday's law allows for curling electric fields in the presence of changing magnetic fields, indicating a broader context for the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which electric fields can be considered mathematically possible or impossible, with no clear consensus reached on the implications of curl and potential functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in definitions and the implications of singularities, as well as the distinction between mathematical and physical possibilities, without resolving these complexities.

bangkokphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question pertaining to mathematically possible E fields.

I've always known the curl of the field has to be zero for the field to be a possible electric field, but is this the sole determining factor? What about if the potential is some wonky function that doesn't seem plausible, and what about discontinuities?

Also, a semantics question, would you think an electric field is mathematically possible if the charge distribution is physically impossible to create?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about an infinitesimal point that has some charge on it. If the field could curl then there could be a spiral of field lines around that point. That wouldn't jive with what physicists have always measured for the field of a point charge, namely, Coulomb's law.

You can actually write a vector equation for Coulomb's law, curl it, and get 0.

As for the second question. I bet you can invent a charge distribution that approaches infinity at some point yet still have a convergent field somewhere. For instance The field may be finite directy in the middle of two bodies whose charge approaches infinity the further away they are.
 
I guess my question can really be boiled down to two questions:

1. Can an electric field function be mathematically possible while its curl is non-zero?
and
2. Can an electric field function be mathematically IMpossible while its curl is zero.
 
1. No. The curl of any gradient is 0. There's a proof for that. The E field is the gradient of the charge distribution therefore its curl is 0.

2. Do you mean physically impossible? If so, maybe.
 
@ Okefenokee: The E field is the gradient of the electric potential field, not the charge distribution.

2. Yes, but only if the curl has a singularity at a point. For instance the field (-y/r^2, x/r^2) (the so-called irrotational vortex) has zero curl everywhere, except at the center, where it's not defined (it can be understood to be infinite). If you compute the line integral around the center, you'll find out it's non-zero, in fact, it's equal to 2\pi. If a contour integral is non-zero, then the field isn't conservative, and thus there can be no potential field.

BTW, in electrodynamics, all of this ceases to be true: Faraday's law says that a changing magnetic field generates a curling electric field at the same point. Similarly, a changing electric field generates a curling magnetic field at the same point. This feedback process originates propagation of electromagnetic waves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K