Electrostatic Equilibrium on the x-axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the position of a positive charge q3 on the x-axis such that the resultant force on it is zero, given two negative charges: q1 = 25 µC at x = 2.0 m and q2 = 6.0 µC at the origin. The solution involves applying Coulomb's law to equate the magnitudes of the forces exerted by the two negative charges on q3. The final calculated position for q3 is x = 0.571 m, after correcting for algebraic errors and ensuring that the distances are squared in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electrostatic forces
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Understanding of electric charge units (microcoulombs)
  • Concept of electrostatic equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Coulomb's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field concepts and calculations
  • Explore the principles of electrostatic equilibrium
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple charges and their interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, educators teaching electric forces, and anyone interested in solving problems related to charge interactions and equilibrium in electric fields.

kevykevy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Question - Three charges lie along the x acis as shown below. The negative charge q1 = 25 uC is at x = 2.0 m, the negative charge q2 = 6.0 uC is at the origin. Where must a positive charge q3 be placed on the x-axis such that the resultant force on it is zero?

Answer - I was thinking the third charge (q3) would be in the middle of the other two charges, my only doubt is that that would be too easy of an answer seeing how this is supposed to be harder than the normal homework. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
 
kevykevy said:
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
Your leaning somewhat in the right direction, but the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between charges. Use Coulomb's law to write the forces calling one distance x and the other distance 2m - x and make the magnitudes of the two forces equal.
 
k so I'll have:

(9x10^9)(6x10^-6)(q3)/x = (9x10^9)(1.5x10^-5)(q3)/2 - x

54000(q3)/x = 135000(q3)/2 - x

54000/x = 135000/2 - x

108000/x = 135000/-x

108000(-x) = 135000(x)

How do I solve from there? Did I make an algebraic error?
 
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
 
kevykevy said:
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
I don't know if that is the correct result, but in your previous post the denominators should all have been squared. Did you fix that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K