Electrostatic Induction: Conductor vs. Dielectric Response Time

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic fields induce charges on conductor surfaces more rapidly than dielectrics respond to the same field, with conduction electrons adjusting in femtoseconds. Detecting this difference requires optical experiments rather than electronic means. Cooling a conductor may enhance its reaction speed to electrostatic fields. However, if the field is changing, it is not considered static, and the terminology shifts to 'electric field.' The discussion highlights the nuances in response times between conductors and dielectrics under electrostatic conditions.
Samson4
Messages
242
Reaction score
15
Do electrostatic fields induce charges on conductor surfaces faster than dielectrics respond to an identical field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conduction electrons adjust in femtoseconds or less; I suspect that dielectrics respond slightly slower.

You cannot detect the difference by electronic means; it would require optical experiments.
 
Thanks Ultrafast. Am I correct in assuming that if a conductor is cooled, it will react faster to electrostatic fields?
 
Samson4 said:
Thanks Ultrafast. Am I correct in assuming that if a conductor is cooled, it will react faster to electrostatic fields?

If a field is changing (which is necessary to reveal any delay), it is no longer 'static'. The term is just 'electric field'.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Thread 'Maxwell stress tensor'

This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
View full post »
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electrostatic Induction in Metals vs Insulators
Replies
1
Views
1K
Characterizing Total Charge of Conductor A in an External Electrical Field
Replies
8
Views
2K
Induced/bound charges in conductors and dielectrics
Replies
5
Views
3K
A Why is "method of image current" valid in magnetostatics?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Charging a small metal ball from a charged hollow sphere
Replies
4
Views
1K
Electric field Difference between Electrostatics and Electrodynamics
Replies
2
Views
3K
I A question about the Second Uniqueness Theorem in electrostatics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Experiment for the existence of electrostatic field
Replies
21
Views
17K
A Voltage and current waves in a transmission line
Replies
4
Views
3K
Is dielectric necessary in capacitors?
Replies
18
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top