Electrostatic magnetic-field interaction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interaction between electrostatic charges and magnetic fields, particularly in the context of a negatively charged van de Graaff generator and its behavior in proximity to a magnet. Participants explore the effects of magnetic fields on static and moving charges, the nature of induced currents, and potential methods for manipulating charge distribution within conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a magnet can influence the electrons on a charged van de Graaff generator, noting that it is in a state of equilibrium with little current.
  • One participant refers to the localized effects of a magnet within a few millimeters of the charged surface.
  • Another participant states that magnets do not affect static charges, but moving electrons can exhibit cycloidal motion in a magnetic field.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between static charges and free electrons in conductors, with questions about why static charges are not influenced by magnetic fields despite being composed of the same electrons.
  • Participants discuss the Lorentz force and its dependence on the movement of charges, suggesting that movement relative to the magnetic field may induce effects on the electrostatically accumulated electrons.
  • One participant explains that moving a magnet toward a metallic surface induces eddy currents, which can affect the rate of change of the magnetic field, but static charges on insulators are bound and less likely to be influenced.
  • A later post inquires about methods to temporarily introduce extra electrons into a conductor using electrostatic charging and pulsed electromagnetic fields, questioning if the moving charges could be affected by changing magnetic fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the influence of magnetic fields on static versus moving charges, with no consensus reached on the mechanisms involved or the potential for manipulating charge distribution within conductors.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of charges in different contexts, such as the effects of magnetic fields on static versus dynamic conditions, and the nature of induced currents in conductors versus insulators. Limitations in understanding the precise interactions and conditions under which these effects occur are acknowledged.

ace333
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
simple eg: negatively charged van de graaff generator top and a magnet. Put magnet near top. Would the magnetic field push the electrons of the charged surface to the sides and deeper into the metallic top?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A charged van de graaff generator is very nearly in equilibrium: it has very little current. Why would the magnet push the electrons in any way?
 
I'm referring to the localised area within a few millimetres from the magnet.
 
Magnets have no effect on static charges, but slowly moving electrons curl up in a magnetic field. In a crossed electrostatic magnetic electric field, the electrons move in a cycloidic manner.
Bob S
 
Why is there no effect on static charges since the electrons are the same
free electrons as in a conductor and on those there is of curse such a
strong effect induced on the same free electrons by a magnetic field. What is the difference since the conductors free electrons are just as static as the electrostatic charge and it is only their abundance that is different. So why can’t they be moved by a magnetic field?
 
ace333 said:
Why is there no effect on static charges since the electrons are the same
free electrons as in a conductor and on those there is of curse such a
strong effect induced on the same free electrons by a magnetic field. What is the difference since the conductors free electrons are just as static as the electrostatic charge and it is only their abundance that is different. So why can’t they be moved by a magnetic field?
The only force on a charge by a static magnetic field is when the charge is moving. It is given by the Loeentz force F:

F = q(E + v x B), where the 2nd term is the vector cross product.

The magnet can prevent slow electrons from moving toward (and "sticking to" for dielectric surfaces) surfaces near the magnet poles.
Bob S
 
"The only force on a charge by a static magnetic field is when the charge is moving."

So since movement is relative than as a magnet is being moved towards (or away) from the metallic negatively charged van de graaff top than the electrostaticly accumulated electrons could be effected, no?
 
Good questions. When a magnet is moved toward or away from a metallic surface, eddy currents are induced in the metallic surface that slow down and retard the dB/dt (changes) in the magnetic field perpendicular to the metallic surface. However, changes in magnetic fields (dB/dt) parallel to the metallic surfaces (if non-magnetic) are only slightly affected. A rapid change in magnetic fields (dB/dt) can induce voltages (Faraday's Law) that will affect static electric charges. But the electric charges on insulators are bound to the insulator by an electrostatic potential called a work function that requires large local electric fields to remove. So even a large dB/dt is not likely to pull charges away from insulators. "Electrostatic" charges on metallic surfaces are image charges due to opposite sign charges either in space (space charge, including ion or electron beams) or on insulating surfaces elsewhere. These charges are unlikely to move.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
THANK YOU> SO Is there a way to mix extra electrons (a non permanent net gain during exposure time) deep into a conductor momentarily without biologically damaging methods? Like electrostatic charging and discharging i.e. moving charges, coupled with rapid pulsed electromagnetic fields? Would the moving charges (high voltage electrostatic) be affected by the changing magnetic fields enough to move off the surface deeper into the conductor momentarily?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K