Electrostatic potential energy of a cubical configuration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electrostatic potential energy (PE) of a cubical configuration of point charges, specifically with each charge being 5.00e and the cube's edge measuring 2 cm. The formula used is U = kQq/r, where k is the Coulomb's constant. The participant initially calculated the PE for three distances but arrived at an incorrect total of 1.65E-24 J. The conversation emphasizes the importance of symmetry in calculating the total energy, suggesting that the last charge's PE should be multiplied by the number of charges and divided by two to account for the energy required to assemble the configuration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatic potential energy and the formula U = kQq/r
  • Familiarity with point charges and their interactions
  • Knowledge of symmetry in physics and its application in energy calculations
  • Basic concepts of work and energy in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the formula U = kQq/r in various configurations
  • Learn about the role of symmetry in electrostatic systems and energy calculations
  • Explore the concept of energy storage in capacitors and its relation to electrostatic potential
  • Investigate the relationship between work done in electric fields and potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric potential energy in multi-charge systems.

Lamp Guy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the Electrostatic potential energy of a cubical configuration of point charges as shown in the figure. Each of the charges is 5.00e and the edge of the cube is 2 cm. (The image is simply a cube with one of the points labeled q)

Homework Equations


U=kQq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to do this problem by finding the PE at 3 different distances, being the closest 3 points, which are 2 cm away, 2nd closest 3 points which are sqrt(8) cm away and the farthest point which is sqrt(12) cm away. Then I used the formula to find the PE from each charge and added them all up. I keep getting the answer 1.65E-24 J, yet it's not right. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Lamp, welcome to PF :)

You could follow a (very!) similar thread here, but I wonder if Oro's hint really helps you.

How would you go about with the same question for e.g. the 4 point charges on the bottom plane ?
 
You found the PE to put that one (last) corner charge in place (from infinity).
How much PE did it take to put the 1st charge in its corner?
but the second charge DID take Energy to put in place.
Symmetry says, multiply the last charge's PE by the number of charges, then divide by 2.
 
Sorry, I'm still super confused...I don't see how symmetry plays into this and how to take into account the charge of the particle I'm calculating from, sorry!
 
you used PE = U = kQq/r a bunch of times (3 + 3 + 1, right?),
and added all these Energies up. You used Q = 5e, and also used q=5e (right?) => PE = 1.65E-24J
... which is the PE for the last corner charge (q), being influenced by the other 7 charges Q that were already assembled.

Have you seen a Capacitor being charged? the first charge goes in very easily, because there's no E-field, so it takes no Work (0).
The last charge to go in takes eVf of Work, because the potential is going to is Vf
... but the capacitor only stores ½ Qf Vf = Qf Vavg ... just like a spring PE function.
 
So in this case, I would take the PE i got for the last charge (1.65E-24 J), multiply it by 8 and divide by 2? Why does the capacitor only store that much?
 
why does a spring only store ½ Fmax xmax ? because the initial stretch took zero Force.
Work accumulates ... really, it is Faverage xtotal , that is stored as Energy = ½ k x2

Why is d = ½ a t2 ? although vfinal = a t , we know that d = vavg t = ½ vfinal t.
You DO remember the formula for KE? ½ m v2 ... it is the same ½ , from the same averaging process.
Every time a variable is squared (in an accumulating process).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K