Electrostatic potential energy of a cubical configuration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electrostatic potential energy of a cubical configuration of point charges, specifically with each charge being 5.00e and the cube's edge measuring 2 cm. The original poster attempts to find the potential energy by considering the distances between the charges and applying the relevant formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's method of calculating potential energy at different distances and the resulting value. Questions arise regarding the role of symmetry in the calculation and how it affects the potential energy for the first charge compared to subsequent charges.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved in calculating potential energy, with some participants offering insights into the implications of symmetry and the work done in assembling the charges. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion regarding the application of the formula and the assumptions made about the energy contributions from each charge. There is also mention of the relationship between work done in charging a capacitor and the energy stored, which may influence the understanding of the problem.

Lamp Guy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the Electrostatic potential energy of a cubical configuration of point charges as shown in the figure. Each of the charges is 5.00e and the edge of the cube is 2 cm. (The image is simply a cube with one of the points labeled q)

Homework Equations


U=kQq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to do this problem by finding the PE at 3 different distances, being the closest 3 points, which are 2 cm away, 2nd closest 3 points which are sqrt(8) cm away and the farthest point which is sqrt(12) cm away. Then I used the formula to find the PE from each charge and added them all up. I keep getting the answer 1.65E-24 J, yet it's not right. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Lamp, welcome to PF :)

You could follow a (very!) similar thread here, but I wonder if Oro's hint really helps you.

How would you go about with the same question for e.g. the 4 point charges on the bottom plane ?
 
You found the PE to put that one (last) corner charge in place (from infinity).
How much PE did it take to put the 1st charge in its corner?
but the second charge DID take Energy to put in place.
Symmetry says, multiply the last charge's PE by the number of charges, then divide by 2.
 
Sorry, I'm still super confused...I don't see how symmetry plays into this and how to take into account the charge of the particle I'm calculating from, sorry!
 
you used PE = U = kQq/r a bunch of times (3 + 3 + 1, right?),
and added all these Energies up. You used Q = 5e, and also used q=5e (right?) => PE = 1.65E-24J
... which is the PE for the last corner charge (q), being influenced by the other 7 charges Q that were already assembled.

Have you seen a Capacitor being charged? the first charge goes in very easily, because there's no E-field, so it takes no Work (0).
The last charge to go in takes eVf of Work, because the potential is going to is Vf
... but the capacitor only stores ½ Qf Vf = Qf Vavg ... just like a spring PE function.
 
So in this case, I would take the PE i got for the last charge (1.65E-24 J), multiply it by 8 and divide by 2? Why does the capacitor only store that much?
 
why does a spring only store ½ Fmax xmax ? because the initial stretch took zero Force.
Work accumulates ... really, it is Faverage xtotal , that is stored as Energy = ½ k x2

Why is d = ½ a t2 ? although vfinal = a t , we know that d = vavg t = ½ vfinal t.
You DO remember the formula for KE? ½ m v2 ... it is the same ½ , from the same averaging process.
Every time a variable is squared (in an accumulating process).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K