Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electrostatic uniqueness theorem

  1. Apr 18, 2010 #1
    There is one thing I don't understand about this and is that besides the Dirichlet and Neumann conditions there seems to be a third one which is important when the method of images is used and is never mentioned. The problem is that Newmann condition requires especification of [itex]\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial \eta}[/itex] at each point on the surface while in electrostaics problems one many times knows two conditions,
    a) the potencial is constant on the limit surfaces, and b) you don't know the normal derivative of phi at each point on the surface but you know the total charge of the conductor,ie, [itex]\oint_S\frac{\partial\phi }{\partial \eta}ds[/itex] in which case the uniqueness theorem also seems to follow easily.
    Can someone please tell me where I'm wrong or if this is not the case why this
    importan observation is never even mentioned in texts?
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 18, 2010 #2

    clem

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That case is covered in Sec. 3.1.1 of Franklin "Classical Electromagnetism", which states
    "the electric field is uniquely specified ... if either the potential or charge is specified on each conductor."
     
  4. Apr 18, 2010 #3
    Thank you, I will look for that
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook