Elementary Differential Forms Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of differential forms, particularly 1-forms, from a physics perspective. Participants explore the nature of projections associated with these forms and their relationship to various vector spaces, including R^3, tangent spaces, and dual spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their understanding of 1-forms as taking a vector and providing the corresponding component based on projections onto coordinate axes.
  • Another participant suggests that projections occur onto tangent space bases situated at a specific point.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of 1-forms mapping tangent vectors into the base field, with examples given for dx, dy, and dz picking out components of tangent vectors in a 3D coordinate system.
  • One participant cautions against calling the operation a "projection," noting that true projections require a metric, while 1-forms act on vectors without needing one.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about whether the projections relate to the original vector or the tangent vector, ultimately leaning towards the tangent vector as the more sensible interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the nature of projections and the spaces involved, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on the terminology or the conceptual framework surrounding the projections of 1-forms.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the distinction between tangent spaces and the original space can be overlooked, particularly in Euclidean contexts. The discussion highlights potential confusion arising from the identification of tangent spaces with Euclidean space itself.

mindarson
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Let me preface by saying I am a physics major. So I am coming at differential forms from the perspective of physics, i.e. work, flows, em fields, etc.

My question is this. My understanding is that a basic 1-form dx, dy, or dz takes a vector v = (v1,v2,v3) and gives back the corresponding component of that vector, i.e. the size of that vector's projection onto the corresponding coordinate axis. The complete 1-form, then, such as phi = Adx + Bdy + Cdz, is the sum of multiples of these projection sizes, where the coefficients are functions of x,y,z.

My confusion is regarding which vector space these projections "occur" in: R^3, the tangent space or the dual space? In any case, how is it possible to project onto the x, y, or z axes within the tangent or dual spaces? Wouldn't the "axes" in the dual space be the "dx-axis", etc.?

Or am I just confusing myself unnecessarily by assuming that the 1-form and the projection (or the input vector and the projection) have to be in the same space?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the "projections" occur as projections onto tangent space bases. that is, {e1,..., en} situated at a point p
 
mindarson said:
My confusion is regarding which vector space these projections "occur" in: R^3, the tangent space or the dual space?

Thanks for your help.

1 forms map tangent vectors into the base field - either the real numbers or the complex numbers.

For instance dx,dy,and dz pick out the x,y, and z components of tangent vectors to a 3 dimensional coordinate system.

In Euclidean space this can get confusing because the tangent space to Euclidean space can be naturally identified with Euclidean space itself and often the distinction is overlooked. Try working with 1 forms on a surface. It will be less confusing.
 
One should be careful calling this kind of operation a "projection". A real projection requires a metric, and one forms naturally act on vectors without need for metric.

The easiest way to see that the one forms dx, dy, and dz don't orthogonally project vectors is to consider the case where the basis vectors are not orthonormal. Consider, if they are skewed, your components for your vectors are no longer the result of orthogonal projections, but dx, dy, and dz always pick out components.
 
First, much-belated thank-you's for taking the time to reply!

lavinia said:
1 forms map tangent vectors into the base field - either the real numbers or the complex numbers.

For instance dx,dy,and dz pick out the x,y, and z components of tangent vectors to a 3 dimensional coordinate system.

In Euclidean space this can get confusing because the tangent space to Euclidean space can be naturally identified with Euclidean space itself and often the distinction is overlooked. Try working with 1 forms on a surface. It will be less confusing.

This has definitely been a source of confusion for me. I knew that the dx, dy, dz picked out the corresponding components, but I did not know of what vector! The original vector or the tangent vector? The tangent vector definitely makes more sense, since the 1-form is analogous to the gradient/derivative, i.e. you add them all up over the whole manifold in order to get the total.

Thanks again for the insight!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K