Elementary Questions on Quantum Physics for 15-18 Year Olds

  • Thread starter Thread starter PipBoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary
PipBoy
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm currently writting an article for people my age (15-18) about Quantum Physics, it's complexity, it's vast uncertainty and it's applications. However, being only young and just halfway through John Gribbin's 'In Search of Schrodinger's Cat', there are several points I would like to raise, but am unnable to explain. I am aware that this may belong in a homeowrk help thread, but I thought I would find the most passionnate and most qualified here. Simple answers please, this is only a simple article! Thanks in advance, PipBoy

Q: In what way does a particle exhibit both wave like and particle like behaviour? What makes it like a wave, what makes it like a particle?
Q: Does Quantum Theory agree with Relativity, and what is the definition of Relativity Theory?

These as a start, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the second question:
As far as I can tell, quantum mechanics has been successfully combined with special relativity the result being quantum electrodynamics. However, there is to date no widely accepted theory of quantum gravity, which combines quantum mechanics with general relativity, Einstein theory of gravitation. I reccomend you do a quick wikipedia search on these theories to read more.
 
Thank you, that's resolved nicely ^^
 
For the first question, watching this youtube video may help:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

On the observer part, you can't take "observer" too literlly. Observer just means a measuring device, whether intelligence is involved or not. It involves interacting the particles being observered, not just passively watching them pass by. Interaction free measurements exist, but probably get deeper than what you need to go.

Here is a video demonstration of the Uncertainty Principle at work, showing actual effects in that case:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7xJ0tjB4A
 
espen180 said:
As far as I can tell, quantum mechanics has been successfully combined with special relativity the result being quantum electrodynamics.

Well, I'd count relativistic quantum mechanics as the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, whereas QED is really quantum mechanics applied to the electromagnetic field.
There does exist non-relativistic QED, as well as relativistic QM without using a quantized field.

So in atomic/molecular physics we tend to distinguish between 'relativistic effects' (such as relativistic momentum corrections, spin-orbit coupling, and Breit-Pauli interactions) and 'QED effects' (such as the Lamb shift).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top