Elliptical Orbits In The Schwarzschild Metric

dman12
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering how you would go about calculating the proper time for an observer following a freely falling elliptical orbit in a Schwarzschild metric.

I am happy with how to calculate the proper time for a circular orbit and was wondering whether if you had two observers start and end at the same spacetime point, for whom would more proper time elapse- one that followed a circular orbit or one that followed an elliptical orbit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I far as I know, there aren't geodesic (i.e., freely falling) elliptical orbits. There are elliptical orbits that are non-geodesics, but, to calculate the time required for one orbit, more knowledge of the orbit is required.

Also, ven circular orbits do not "start and end at the same spacetime point", as time elapses.
 
To add a bit to George Jones answer, non-circular orbits in SC metric never quite close (due to perihelion advance), so they are not ellipses.

You certainly can arrange for a non-circular (near elliptic) free faller to meet a circular orbiter at two events. Then, the general rule is that the if the non-circular trajectory is outside of circular orbit between meetings, the non-circular free faller will age more. Conversely, if you arrange it so non-circular trajectory is inside the circular orbit between meetings, the circular orbiter will age more.
 
In very, very special circumstances, there are (freely falling) closed "spirograph" orbits.

A condition for a closed orbit is that the precession angle divides evenly into an integral multiple of 360 degrees, i.e., n*360/(precession angle) = m, where n and m are integers. If this is true, then the total precession after m aphelia is n times 360 degrees, hence the repetition.
 
Here are a couple of references that might help with the calculation

Uros Kostic, Analytical time-like geodesics in Schwarzschild
space-time. General Relativity and Gravitation, 2012.
Preprint :http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.5611v1.pdf

G. V. Kraniotis, S. B. Whitehouse,
Precession of Mercury in General Relativity, the Cosmolog-
ical Constant and Jacobi’s Inversion problem.
Preprint http://128.84.158.119/abs/astro-ph/0305181v3
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top