EM wave described using a sine function.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical representation of electromagnetic (EM) waves using a sine function, specifically the equation of the form Asin(kx-ωt). Participants are exploring the implications of including both position (x) and time (t) in this equation and questioning how they interact within the context of wave behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the expression kx-ωt does not yield a constant value and questions the cancellation of terms. Other participants raise points about the variability of x and t, suggesting that the values can lead to different results rather than always being zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing calculations to illustrate their points. There is a recognition that the original poster may be using limited values, and others are encouraging a broader exploration of the variables involved. No consensus has been reached, but there is a productive exchange of ideas regarding the behavior of the wave equation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the original poster's calculations may be constrained by the specific values chosen for k, ω, and t, which could lead to misunderstandings about the nature of the wave equation. There is an acknowledgment of the need to consider a wider range of values to fully grasp the oscillatory behavior of the wave.

Darren93
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm going through my notes and I don't understand how they have included position in an equation to describe an EM wave. The equation is of the form http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/6/3/f6386c1751b91ec23c7123b15a11b52f.png [Asin(kx-ωt)]. This equation is just stated in my notes and there is no description of where this came from. Surely if you input both position and time in this manor they both cancel each other out and you always get sin(0). Like at x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4. Then kx-ωt=π/2-π/2 = 0. It's the same for every value of t and x, always 0? I mean I could understand using either Asin(kx) or Asin(ωt) but does both in the same equation not cancel each other out? What am I missing?

[link to wikipedia page about this description: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave#General_form ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would kx-ωt be always 0? In this case x would be the position where you measure the field, which can be any point and t is the time when you measure it, which can be any time.You will of course have some points where the amplitude is 0 at any given time but not all.
 
Well all the values I use I end up getting kx-ωt=0. That's the problem it shouldn't always be zero. It should be zero for x=0,λ,2λ and ect. However x=λ/4 should give kx-ωt= π/2. When I tried calculating this for x=λ/4 I got:

x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=0

So I'm doing something wrong but what? I suspect its the values of k,ω or t I'm using but I really don't know.
 
Darren93 said:
Well all the values I use I end up getting kx-ωt=0

Then you are using very few values.

x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=0

but after T/4
x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/2

kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*(T/2)
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(π)
kx-ωt=-3n/2

or at another position at the same time

x=λ, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=T/4
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ)-(2π/T)*(T/4)
kx-ωt=(2π)-(π/2)
kx-ωt=-3n/2

or any other time δt
x=λ/4, k=2π/λ, ω=2π/T, t=δt
kx-ωt=(2π/λ)*(λ/4)-(2π/T)*δt
kx-ωt=(π/2)-(2πδt/T)The field at any point x will oscillate between -A,0,A in time. You can always find a time when the field is -A,A at a given point but that does not mean that it is constant in time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K