EM Waves: How Do They Get Generated?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the generation of electromagnetic (EM) waves by oscillating or accelerating charges, exploring the implications for energy conservation and the definition of isolated systems in classical electrodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how EM waves can be generated without violating energy conservation when two charges are released from a potential energy state.
  • Another participant explains that an accelerating charge radiates energy and momentum, which affects its kinetic energy and momentum, suggesting this reconciles the energy conservation issue.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that considering only the two charges as the system leads to an apparent energy violation, unless the system is redefined to include the radiation produced.
  • One participant argues that isolated charges are a simplification and that in reality, charges and their fields interact, leading to EM radiation, thus complicating the definition of an isolated system.
  • Another participant reflects on the implications of defining an isolated system, using the example of a body cooling and emitting radiation, questioning the validity of the initial definition.
  • Further discussion highlights that energy is conserved by recognizing that the energy of EM radiation was already present as potential energy in the system of charges.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared, indicating a shift in understanding regarding energy and the concept of isolated systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of isolated systems and the implications for energy conservation in the context of EM wave generation. There is no consensus on how to reconcile these concepts, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of defining isolated systems and the complexities introduced by interactions between charges and their fields, as well as the implications of energy transformations in various contexts.

torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
I read that em waves get generated by oscillating and/or accelerating charges. I am confused on how this occurs. Doesn't this violate energy conservation? Say 2 charges( a +& a -) are separated by a certain distance. So they have potential energy. Then you let them go. The potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. But if the potential energy is converted to kinetic, where does this leave room for em waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to classical electrodynamics, an accelerating charge has to radiate. The radiation has both energy and momentum, which comes at the expense of the KE and momentum of the charged particle. So, the charged particle will actually accelerate less than a neutral particle of the same mass under the same force. It’s as if the radiation is having a recoil effect on the charge. That solves your energy conservation problem, I hope.
 
But if you consider the system to be just the 2 charges, there is energy violation. Because there is no external force acting on the system. Unless the system now changes to the 2 charges plus the radiation. But I don't think that is allowed because the system defined in the first place is just the 2 charges(+a &-a).
 
(Remember, according to classical electrodynamics, an accelerating charge has to radiate.)

Isolated charges only occur in the first chapter of elementary electrostatics textbooks. In reality, you have the two charges, and their fields filling the Universe (somewhat loosely speaking, of course.) The charges and the fields interact mutually, giving rise to EM radiation. I am trying to answer as simply as possible.

Suppose you put a body in vacuum, and define it to be an isolated body. But then it cools off, giving off infrared radiation. What will you say now? Is it still an isolated body, by your “definition”?
 
Suppose you put a body in vacuum said:
Yeah, that is what I'm confused about. So the initially defined system is just the isolated body. And the system after is still the same because the isolated body(previous)=the body+em energy. Therefore no external work is done on the system. And energy and momentum is conserved. Am I correct with this line of thinking ?
 
torquerotates said:
But if you consider the system to be just the 2 charges, there is energy violation. Because there is no external force acting on the system. Unless the system now changes to the 2 charges plus the radiation. But I don't think that is allowed because the system defined in the first place is just the 2 charges(+a &-a).

The energy was already there, in a different form. Suppose an “isolated” bomb explodes, then the chemical energy just got converted into mechanical energy.

Isolated systems are mental constructs invented by scientists to study certain aspects of Physics without getting cluttered by non-essentials. For example, in thermodynamics, an isolated system may mean an insulated container which cannot exchange energy or matter with outside. In mechanics, isolated systems generally mean one on which no external force or torque is acting. But internal forces can always be there.

In the example I’d given, suppose we are only studying the angular momentum of the body (classically). Then it hardly matters whether the body cools off or not. But in reality, there is no system which is isolated.

Coming back to your original problem, your isolated system consisted of two charges. If the two charges interacted and produced EM radiation, it’s somewhat like the bomb exploding. The energy of EM radiation was already there as PE.

And the system after is still the same because the isolated body(previous)=the body+em energy. Therefore no external work is done on the system. And energy and momentum is conserved. Am I correct with this line of thinking ?

Yes.
 
Last edited:
Oh... I see. Thanks your last post was very insightful. I've been confused on how energy and systems work until you brought up your point about the virtual non-existence of isolated systems. Well, I've only taken mechanics and E&M. But not thermo yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K