Emf induced by swinging rod in magnetic field (I got 2 answers?)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the induced electromotive force (emf) in a swinging rod within a magnetic field. Participants are examining the conditions under which the emf is generated, particularly focusing on the orientation of the magnetic field relative to the velocity of the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the relationship between the magnetic field and the velocity of the rod, questioning the assumptions made regarding their orientations. There are discussions about the implications of the velocity being parallel to the magnetic field and how that affects the induced emf.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different interpretations of the problem, with participants offering insights into the equations involved and questioning the validity of certain assumptions. Some guidance has been provided regarding the expressions for velocity and the components of the vectors involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in the expressions for the components of the vectors involved, particularly in the context of small angle approximations and the setup of the pendulum system. There is also mention of specific values for induced emf, which raises further questions about the assumptions made in the calculations.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


auccxv.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Their answer assumes that the B-field is perpendicular to the velocity at all times, which is clearly not the case.

1g0uxj.png


And in the next part of the question, won't the answer be zero? since now velocity is parallel to B-field? (So rod is simply moving along the field)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
θyes, "in the next part of the question", since B and v are in the same direction the answer is zero volts.

I can understand what you tried to do better with your first go, even though the answer was wrong & was right in the second go.

So: r = R sin θ i ... never mind the j part, it's in line with B ...
For small angles, how can you simplify (approximate) this eq?

Then v = ?

Then do your emf = v x B * L

Finally, what is the equation for θ(t) for a simple pendulum?
 
rude man said:
θyes, "in the next part of the question", since B and v are in the same direction the answer is zero volts.

I can understand what you tried to do better with your first go, even though the answer was wrong & was right in the second go.

So: r = R sin θ i ... never mind the j part, it's in line with B ...
For small angles, how can you simplify (approximate) this eq?

Then v = ?

Then do your emf = v x B * L

Finally, what is the equation for θ(t) for a simple pendulum?

approx r = Rθ i

then v = R dθ/dt

ε = BR*(dθ/dt)

θ = θ0 cos(ω0t)
(dθ/dt) = θ0ω0 sin(ω0t)

okay it all works out now..thanks a lot!

In my first part, I assumed (dθ/dt) = ω0 = 2∏/T which is wrong as (dθ/dt) is not constant.
 
Good work! Wish every OP was as sharp & interested as you.
 
rude man said:
Good work! Wish every OP was as sharp & interested as you.

However, I just realized that the last part indicated that an emf was induced (8mV)...How is that possible? Are they assuming the oscillations are not perpendicular to the B-field now?
 
unscientific said:
However, I just realized that the last part indicated that an emf was induced (8mV)...How is that possible? Are they assuming the oscillations are not perpendicular to the B-field now?

There is also a vertical component to v , right? I was looking at your expression for r and I don't think I agree with your j component. r is the vector going from the pendulum at rest to its position at an angle θ. So if θ = 0 then the j component of r is zero, not R as you have it.

This is the crux of the issue since once you get the j component of v right the rest is just repeating what you did before but with B = B i instead of B j . Let's work on getting v right.
 
rude man said:
There is also a vertical component to v , right? I was looking at your expression for r and I don't think I agree with your j component. r is the vector going from the pendulum at rest to its position at an angle θ. So if θ = 0 then the j component of r is zero, not R as you have it.

This is the crux of the issue since once you get the j component of v right the rest is just repeating what you did before but with B = B i instead of B j . Let's work on getting v right.

the origin is taken at the top of the swing, so at θ = 0, x = 0, y = -R as indicated.
 
unscientific said:
the origin is taken at the top of the swing, so at θ = 0, x = 0, y = -R as indicated.

OK, but we need to get the right expression for v in the y direction. I don't quite dig you expressions for r and then v = dr/dt. If you go with yours, v in the y direction approximates to
vy = R θ dθ/dt whereas I make it 2R θ dθ/dt. Factor of 2 off.

My way: origin at pendulum mass when θ = 0. Then for small θ, s = arc length = Rθ, x = s cosθ and y = s sinθ. So y = Rθ sinθ ~ R2θ and therefore vy = d/dt(Rθ2) = R d/dt(θ2) = 2Rθ dθ/dt.

We need to put this to bed, or you could proceed with the problem using your or my vy.

Anyway, after that it's just more of the same as before, using the expression for θ(t) for a simple pendulum.
 
rude man said:
origin at pendulum mass when θ = 0. Then for small θ, s = arc length = Rθ, x = s cosθ and y = s sinθ.
At angle θ, the vertical displacement is R(1-cos(θ)) ≈ Rθ2/2.
 
  • #10
Haruspex looks like he has it right, so we go with your expression for v_y = R*theta d(theta)/dt.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K