EMF Oppsition in Adjacent Wires +/- Swing

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fluxation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Swing Wires
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving the behavior of electromagnetic fields (EMF) in a two-conductor "figure eight" wire configuration connected to a push-pull audio amplifier. Participants explore the implications of current reversal in the conductors and its effects on EMF, as well as potential methods to mitigate these effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the current reversal in the conductors causes the EMF to oppose twice each cycle.
  • Another participant suggests that the output of a push-pull amplifier can only swing negative if its power supplies include positive and negative rails or if the output is capacitively coupled.
  • A participant mentions that the arrangement of the wires may involve inductance, proposing that the configuration could ideally have zero inductance due to the opposing loops.
  • One participant states that driving the two wires in differential mode results in two opposite voltage peaks per AC cycle, while common-mode driving leads to the same voltage throughout the cycle.
  • There are inquiries about practical solutions to prevent opposing EMF, such as using a blocking capacitor or isolation transformer, with requests for explanations on their practical use.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of current reversal on EMF and the potential solutions to mitigate these effects. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding due to the absence of visual aids, such as diagrams, which could clarify the circuit configuration being discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring audio amplifier design, electromagnetic theory, or those involved in practical electronics and circuit design.

Fluxation
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Can someone please help with this thought experiment? I have sought advice elsewhere but it remains unclear to me.

I have a straight piece of two conductor "figure eight" wire (like speaker wire or US power cord) laid out left to right.

I connect the output from a push-pull type audio amplifier across each conductor, but with the active and ground reference wires on opposite ends for each. Let's assume series resistance so no dead short.

As I understand, at any given moment (apart from crossover) the current in each conductor will be moving oppositely to the other, thus causing their respective EMF's to oppose.

My question relates to the fact that the push-pull output swings both plus and minus relative to ground.

1. Does this current reversal cause the EMF to oppose twice each cycle?

2. If so, is there any way to prevent this, e.g. with a blocking capacitor or isolation transformer? Please explain how in practical use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fluxation said:
Can someone please help with this thought experiment? I have sought advice elsewhere but it remains unclear to me.

I have a straight piece of two conductor "figure eight" wire (like speaker wire or US power cord) laid out left to right.

I connect the output from a push-pull type audio amplifier across each conductor, but with the active and ground reference wires on opposite ends for each. Let's assume series resistance so no dead short.

As I understand, at any given moment (apart from crossover) the current in each conductor will be moving oppositely to the other, thus causing their respective EMF's to oppose.

My question relates to the fact that the push-pull output swings both plus and minus relative to ground.

1. Does this current reversal cause the EMF to oppose twice each cycle?

2. If so, is there any way to prevent this, e.g. with a blocking capacitor or isolation transformer? Please explain how in practical use.
Without a sketch or schematic, I could only guess at your question. Could you please sketch the circuit on paper and post a (clear, bright) cellphone picture using the UPLOAD button in the Edit window? You can Upload PDF or JPEG copies of the picture.

Also, the output of a push-pull amplifier can only swing negative if its power supplies include positive and negative rails (or if the output is capacitively coupled).
 
I have prepared a diagram but don't see any way to upload local content.
 
Fluxation said:
I have prepared a diagram but don't see any way to upload local content.
berkeman said:
using the UPLOAD button in the Edit window? You can Upload PDF or JPEG copies of the picture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
If you mean the icons in the gray bar at the top of the text entry window, I find nothing that reads "upload". I can add an image but it then asks for its URL. My apologies for the handholding exercise, but I use a computer regularly and see no direct upload.

From another source, this is the type of situation referred to in my OP. Please reread for clarity. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mrr3wIFjxqI/hqdefault.jpg

The amp I have in mind is definitely push-pull output. A hi-fi unit with one channel to be connected across each of the + and - terminations as shown on the diagram linked above.
 
Fluxation said:
I use a computer regularly and see no direct upload.
I am. at this moment, looking at the Upload button on my browser. It is near the bottom of this message window and to the right of the Post Reply and Preview buttons. It will give you a file selection window etc. etc. follow the instructions it gives you.

I have great sympathy. Whenever I ask supermarket staff where an item can be found, I always find I am standing right next to it. Sheepish grin :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
If I could upload a screenshot, it would show there is nothing to the right of the post reply button. It's on the very edge of the content box. No "preview" button either. At a loss to explain, but then I use Linux.

Can anyone offer a reply to my original question?
 
Hmm. now the buttons have appeared in the "Have something to add?" field. IOW I needed to reply to myself (apparently).

So here is the diagram I made to clarify my original question.
 

Attachments

Fluxation said:
If I could upload a screenshot, it would show there is nothing to the right of the post reply button. It's on the very edge of the content box. No "preview" button either. At a loss to explain, but then I use Linux.

Can anyone offer a reply to my original question?
This seems to me to be a question involving Inductance. Your arrangement has two loops in the opposite sense so the Inductance will be (ideally) zero for the reason you suggest. So called Bifilar windings are used when the parasitic (unwanted) Inductance needs to be eliminated or reduced. It works as long as the dimensions of the coil are a lot less than the wavelength of the signal.
PS Could the missing buttons have been caused by 'Zoom"? What actual browser are you using? Firefox works on most Operating Systems, I think.
 
  • #10
Fluxation said:
1. Does this current reversal cause the EMF to oppose twice each cycle?

2. If so, is there any way to prevent this, e.g. with a blocking capacitor or isolation transformer? Please explain how in practical use.
If you drive the two wires in differential mode, then yes, you will get two opposite voltage peaks per AC cycle. If you drive them in common-mode, they have the same voltage throughout the AC cycle.

Can you say more about your project? We can probably help you figure out how to do what you want to do if we know more context. Thanks. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
46K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K