Emission probability calculation (quick and easy question)

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of total probabilities for specific gamma decays using a simulation program called PENCYL. The individual discussing the topic provides a link to a data table and asks for guidance on how to calculate the probabilities listed next to each energy. Another individual points out that the probabilities listed in the table are for the number of gammas produced per decay, not the percentage of total gammas. They suggest adding up all of the gammas and normalizing the total percentages to 1. The conversation ends with a discussion about cobalt 60, with one individual questioning the probabilities listed in the data table.
  • #1
tirwit
16
0
Hi!

This is a very basic question. How do I calculate the total probability for a certain gamma of a decay? For example, I know from empiric method that the 2 gammas from Co60 have a probability of 50%. But for Eu152 I have lots of gammas and I need to compute them all in a simulation program called PENCYL (from the PENELOPE package), so, I have this data:

http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=630152

But the probabilities next to the energies are not the total probabilities... How do I calculate them?

Thanks :)
tirwit

PS: WE'RE ARE ALL IN A BLACK HOLE! We just don't know it yet =P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think you can calculate them. They are empirically measured. Why do you think you can calculate them?
 
  • #3
The table for nuclide search for Co60 at http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=270060, give intensity for it's 2 main gammas. Each gamma has a intensity of approximately 99,9%, but these 2 if sum, give more than 100%. But, for Co60 (a simple case just to demonstrate), we know that each of those gammas is seen 50% of the times for each of the gammas. So, my question is, how do we pass of a intensity of 99,9% to 50%? If you can show me the way or tell me where can I get info about that, I'll calculate the same thing for Eu152. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
You're misunderstanding the decay chain. Try going to this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_scheme , where there is a diagram of the Co-60 energy levels. Almost all of the time, both the 1.17 MeV and the 1.33 MeV gammas are produced by a single atom as the nucleus decays from Co-60 to Ni-60. That's why the probabilities sum to >100%, because the number of gammas produced per decay is >1. So we never have to pass from 99.9% to 50%.
 
  • #5
So when I'm writing the code and the instructions for the source definition say:

C SPECTR : For a source with continuous (stepwise constant) spectrum,
C each 'SPECTR' line gives the lower end-point of an energy
C bin of the source spectrum (Ei) and the associated relative
C probability (Pi), integrated over the bin. Up to NSEM=200
C lines, in arbitrary order. The upper end of the spectrum is
C defined by entering a line with Ei equal to the upper energy
C value and with Pi set to a negative value.
C DEFAULT: none

how do I calculate the associated relative probability? The code example which had the Co60 defined, was like this:

SPECTR 1173.237e3 0.5e0
SPECTR 1173.273e3
SPECTR 1332.501e3 0.5e0
SPECTR 1332.501E3 -1.0e-1
 
  • #6
I'm not sure, but it looks to me like whoever wrote the Co-60 code example also misunderstood and that the code example is wrong.
 
  • #7
Nah, the code example is right ;). It comes in the PENELOPE package. It's a Monte Carlo Simulation for energy loss of particles in materials. It's used, among other things, to calibrate the efficiency of radiation detectors. It's driving me crazy lol :eek:

My supposition is that for a spectrum of Co60, the 2 gammas represent 0,5 (each of them), of the gammas observed, where the whole spectrum of Co60 would correspond to 100%.

Thanks for the help anyway =)
 
  • #8
I see. I think the difference is that your code is calculating the percentage of total gammas which are of each energy, while the nuclide tables are giving the number of gammas per decay which are of each energy. So I think the answer to your original question is that you just need to add up all of the gammas in the nuclide tables and divide by this number so that the sum of the total percentages are normalized to 1.
 
  • #9
Go to

http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=630152

Look in Most Recent ENSDF Data (12/2002) and click on the gammas for both the electron capture and the beta decay modes; they list the gamma probabilities in the Igamma column. [STRIKE]The sum for each decay mode is 100%.[/STRIKE] To get absolute intensity, multiply by the EC or beta (-) branching ratios listed at bottom of page. Eu [STRIKE]252[/STRIKE] 152 (odd-odd) decays to both Z=64 and Z=62 nuclei.

Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Following your method I also checked the datasheet for 60Co. The listed branching ratio in the bottom of the page was 1. Which would give the same 0,99 intensity for the two 60Co main gammas, when it should give 0,5 for each gamma.

Am I confusing the concepts?
 
  • #11
tirwit said:
Following your method I also checked the datasheet for 60Co. The listed branching ratio in the bottom of the page was 1. Which would give the same 0,99 intensity for the two 60Co main gammas, when it should give 0,5 for each gamma. Am I confusing the concepts?
In cobalt 60, the probability of each gamma being emitted in a single beta decay is 99.98%. Look at the Java level scheme. The 1.1 and 1.3 MeV gammas are in series. The sum of the two probabilities is meaningless.

Bob S
 

1. What is emission probability calculation and why is it important in science?

Emission probability calculation is a mathematical method used to determine the likelihood of a particular event or outcome occurring. In science, it is important because it allows researchers to make predictions and draw conclusions based on data and observations.

2. How is emission probability calculated?

Emission probability is typically calculated using Bayes' theorem, which takes into account prior knowledge and observations to calculate the likelihood of a specific event occurring.

3. What factors can affect the accuracy of emission probability calculations?

There are several factors that can affect the accuracy of emission probability calculations, including the quality and quantity of data used, the assumptions made in the calculation, and any external factors that may influence the outcome.

4. Can emission probability calculations be used in different fields of science?

Yes, emission probability calculations can be used in various fields of science, including biology, chemistry, physics, and environmental science. It is a versatile and widely used method for analyzing and predicting outcomes.

5. Are there any limitations to using emission probability calculations?

Like any mathematical model, emission probability calculations are not perfect and may have limitations. These limitations can include simplifying assumptions, potential bias in the data used, and the inability to account for all variables that may affect the outcome.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
886
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
889
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
67
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
784
Back
Top