Energy and Force: Is it Possible?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ahyaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of having energy changes in a system without an associated net force. Participants explore theoretical scenarios and examples, questioning the relationship between energy, force, and work, particularly at macroscopic and quantum levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy changes without a net force should be impossible, as energy is defined through the work function, which relies on force.
  • Others argue that it is possible to have energy without a force at the macroscopic level, but work cannot be done without a force acting through a distance.
  • A participant introduces quantum mechanics, suggesting that the concept of force becomes less clear, particularly when discussing photon interactions with atoms.
  • One participant presents a scenario involving a figure skater pushing off a wall, suggesting that while a normal force is present, no work is done due to lack of displacement, yet an energy change occurs.
  • Another scenario discussed involves thermodynamic changes in thermal energy, where forces are present during particle collisions, indicating that energy changes are still associated with forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether energy changes can occur without net force, with no consensus reached on the validity of the proposed scenarios or the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that their examples may not fully resolve the question, and there are limitations in defining forces at the quantum level versus classical mechanics.

ahyaa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I was wondering if it was possible to have energy without an associated force. More specifically, can there be an energy change in a system without a net force? From what I know, this SHOULD be impossible because energy is the integral of the work function which depends on force. On the other hand, would it be correct to say it is possible to have net forces acting on a system with no net energy change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ahyaa said:
Hello all,

I was wondering if it was possible to have energy without an associated force. More specifically, can there be an energy change in a system without a net force? From what I know, this SHOULD be impossible because energy is the integral of the work function which depends on force. On the other hand, would it be correct to say it is possible to have net forces acting on a system with no net energy change?
You can have energy without an associated force. But, at the macroscopic level at least, work cannot be done with that energy without a force being applied through a distance.

At the quantum level it gets a little murky. The concept of force is not as clear. For example, when an atom absorbs or emits a photon, there is a change in momentum of the atom corresponding to the momentum of the photon emitted or absorbed. But if you contemplate that change being caused by a Newtonian force of the photon on the atom one would have to find that there is a force applied by the atom to the photon. But, unfortunately, the Newtonian concept of force does not really apply to a photon.

AM
 
ahyaa said:
Hello all,

I was wondering if it was possible to have energy without an associated force. More specifically, can there be an energy change in a system without a net force? From what I know, this SHOULD be impossible because energy is the integral of the work function which depends on force. On the other hand, would it be correct to say it is possible to have net forces acting on a system with no net energy change?

Show example where you think such a thing is possible.

Zz.
 
Andrew Mason said:
But if you contemplate that change being caused by a Newtonian force of the photon on the atom one would have to find that there is a force applied by the atom to the photon. But, unfortunately, the Newtonian concept of force does not really apply to a photon.

AM

Wow, interesting, thanks!



ZapperZ said:
Show example where you think such a thing is possible.

Zz.

I think I should have re-phrased my original post; I was wondering if it's possible for a system to have an energy change WITHOUT a net force acting over a distance.

I actually don't have my own example of where that would be possible, I was just purely curious.

Some scenarios that did make me think of this:

1) A figure skater pushes off a wall (the system: figure skater and wall). A normal force is exerted on her by the wall, yet no work is done on her by the wall, because there is no displacement of her hands at the same time the normal force of the wall pushes on her hands. Although there is no net work done by the wall, I learned that for this scenario, there is still an energy change associated with the wall's normal force. The energy change here is that of chemical energy the skater metabolizes into kinetic energy.

So, in this scenario, if I'm analyzing this correctly, there's work done by the skater because there's no displacement of the skater's hands, which is the object on which the wall's normal force acts. This is pretty intuitive.

2) Another scenario is in thermodynamics - a change in thermal energy. However, I know that thermal energy is caused by collisions of particles, which exert forces on each other during momentary 'inelastic' periods of their collisions. So there are atomic "normal forces" on each other when two particles of different speeds collide. Thus changes in thermal energy are due to these collisions, so there are still forces acting here even though it's not obvious.



So, other than what Andrew Mason presented I wouldn't have any actual cases in which there would be no energy change associated with a force*displacement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K