Energy and friction -- Can the block make it all the way up the ramp?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of a block moving up a ramp, focusing on the effects of energy conservation, friction, and an impact event at the ramp's base. Participants explore the implications of these factors on the block's ability to ascend the ramp, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of the scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the impact event at the ramp's base should be considered, as it may lead to energy loss that affects the block's ascent.
  • Others argue that the problem can be simplified by assuming energy conservation until friction acts on the block while ascending the ramp.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of initial conditions, particularly the compression of a spring, which may influence the energy available for the block's movement.
  • One participant mentions dividing the problem into two parts to analyze the energy transitions more clearly.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the sudden change in direction at the ramp's base should not alter the speed's magnitude, only its direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the impact event should be included in the analysis, leading to an unresolved discussion regarding the best approach to the problem. There is also uncertainty about the significance of initial conditions in the context of the exercise.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem's complexity may vary based on the initial conditions, such as the amount of spring compression, which has not been definitively established in the discussion.

LulyPop
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
New user has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork questions
Homework Statement
Can the block go up the ramp completely even with the friction of the ramp?
Relevant Equations
∆E = ∆K - ∆U
∆U = m* g* h
Wm = -1/2 kx²
Wfat = µc * m *g *d
Quest 4.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There will be an impact event when the block reaches lower end of the ramp. Do you wish to correctly consider that and the associated energy loss, or did you intend this to be done assuming energy is conserved until the friction work on the ramp occurs?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LulyPop
Dr.D said:
There will be an impact event when the block reaches lower end of the ramp. Do you wish to correctly consider that and the associated energy loss, or did you intend this to be done assuming energy is conserved until the friction work on the ramp occurs?
Hi!
I didn't think about the impact with the start of the ramp. I considered that until we go up the ramp we have only conservative forces. When going up, as we have the kinetic frictional force, which is a non-conservative force, I think it reduces the speed of the block and transforms the kinetic energy of the block to another form of energy.
 
LulyPop said:
Hi!
I didn't think about the impact with the start of the ramp. I considered that until we go up the ramp we have only conservative forces. When going up, as we have the kinetic frictional force, which is a non-conservative force, I think it reduces the speed of the block and transforms the kinetic energy of the block to another form of energy.
Yeah, I think this is a simple enough problem (as shown) that you don't need to consider the abrupt transition impact. Just go ahead and solve it using the friction coefficient (and associated force) changing the PE-KE balance. Please show us your work. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller and LulyPop
berkeman said:
Yeah, I think this is a simple enough problem (as shown) that you don't need to consider the abrupt transition impact. Just go ahead and solve it using the friction coefficient (and associated force) changing the PE-KE balance. Please show us your work. Thank you.
Thank you for the tips. I'll try again!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
It is a pretty good assume conservation of energy as the block approaches the ramp. However, the impact at the sudden direction change will reduce the kinetic energy available for the climb.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LulyPop
Don't we need some initial condition ? I feel it makes a difference if the spring is compressed by 2 m instead of 0.5 m ... :rolleyes:
Or is that part of the exercise ?

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LulyPop
BvU said:
Don't we need some initial condition ? I feel it makes a difference if the spring is compressed by 2 m instead of 0.5 m ... :rolleyes:
Or is that part of the exercise ?

##\ ##
Exactly! I tried it in several ways and got the x of the Elastic Potential Energy formula (U = kx ^ 2/2). Today the professor said he was wrong and added a piece of information to the question. He forgot to say that x = 20cm
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
Dr.D said:
It is a pretty good assume conservation of energy as the block approaches the ramp. However, the impact at the sudden direction change will reduce the kinetic energy available for the climb.
I am dividing the problem into two parts. And I will follow your line of reasoning. Thank you very much!
 
  • #11
LulyPop said:
I am dividing the problem into two parts. And I will follow your line of reasoning. Thank you very much!
To get started, don't make things too difficult.
You have initial spring compression energy ##\rightarrow## initial kinetic energy ##\rightarrow## maximum ##\Delta h##.
So the yes/no can be resolved. Since you know nothing about the sudden direction change, the best you can do is assume that speed changes direction, not magnitude at that point.

##\ ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
850
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K