Energy and Simple Harmonic Motion.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving energy conservation in the context of a block dropped onto a vertical spring. The spring has a known spring constant, and the block compresses the spring upon impact. Participants are exploring how to calculate the height from which the block was dropped, considering the spring's compression and gravitational potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy principles, questioning how to incorporate the spring's compression into their calculations. Some express confusion about the relationship between initial height and the spring's compression.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different approaches to the problem, with some suggesting specific formulas and others questioning the assumptions made regarding potential energy references. There is ongoing exploration of the energy states at various points in the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining the zero potential energy level and the implications of the spring's compression on the calculations. There is mention of a specific numerical value for the spring constant and mass, as well as the gravitational constant, which are relevant to the problem but not fully resolved in the discussion.

sailordragonball
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A vertical spring with a spring constant of 470 N/m is mounted on the floor. From directly above the spring, which is unstrained, a 0.30 kg block is dropped from rest. It collides with and sticks to the spring, which is compressed by 2.5 cm in bringing the block to a momentary halt. Assuming air resistance is negligible, from what height (in cm) above the compressed spring was the block dropped?

... I tried using KEo + PEo + SPEo = KEf + PEf + SPEf ... but, I can't get anywhere ...

... I found out that the frequency is 18.05hz and it's relative time is .056 seconds - and that's where I'm stuck!

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I made a mistake ...

... I found a formula ...

... initial height = (2*mass*gravity)/(spring constant) ...

... but, there's the 2.5cm differential?

... what do I do?

Any help is gladly appreciated.
 
I'd use conservation of energy like you originally suggested. the 2.5 cm compression of the spring comes in there.
 
I tried that ... but, the lingering the final displacement of 2.5cm is messing me up ... I was wondering ...

(mass*gravity)(initial height + 2.5cm) = .5(spring constant)[(2.5)^2] ...

... your thoughts?
 
First -- decide where the potential energy is defined as ZERO. You can put this anywhere... but be consistent.

Then -- look not just at the point where the brick is released, and the point where the brick is compressing the spring, but also think about the intermediate point (when the brick first starts to compress the spring).
Think about that types of energy (PE and or KE) are at each location.

Finally -- make sure the total energy at each location (PE+KE) is equal to the total energy at each other location (PE+KE).
 
I figured it out:

k = 470(N/m) - given
m = .3kg - given
x = 2.5 cm ... but use 0.025m in the arithmetic
g = 9.8 - given
h = initial height

(mass*gravity)(initial height + displacement) = .5(spring constant)[(displacement)^2]

(.3*9.8)(initial height + .025) = .5(470)[(.025)^2]

2.94(initial height + .025) = .146875

2.94(initial height) + .0735 = .146875

[initial height = .0249m] or [initial height = 2.49cm]

Use initial height = 2.49cm for the remainder of the problem.... now find total height ...

... total height = initial height + displacement ...

... total height = 2.49cm + 2.5cm ...

... total height = 4.99cm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K