Maximizing Force in Simple Harmonic Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter erisedk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two masses connected to a vertical spring, with one mass executing simple harmonic motion while the other remains stationary. The objective is to determine the maximum force exerted by the system on the floor, considering the dynamics of the spring and the weights of the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of spring constant and the forces acting on the lower mass. Questions arise regarding the inclusion of the upper mass's weight in the force calculation and the implications of spring compression.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equilibrium position and the forces acting on the lower mass, while others have questioned the initial assumptions regarding force contributions. There appears to be a productive exploration of the concepts involved, with participants clarifying their understanding of the system's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of spring dynamics and the interaction between the two masses, with specific attention to how the spring's compression affects the overall force on the ground. The discussion reflects an ongoing examination of the problem's setup and assumptions.

erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Two bodies of masses 1 kg and 4 kg are connected to a vertical spring, as shown in the figure. The smaller mass executes simple harmonic motion of angular frequency 25 rad/s, and amplitude 1.6 cm while the bigger mass remains stationary on the ground. The maximum force exerted by the system on the floor is (take g=10ms−2)
99887.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


ω = √k/m
So, k = mω2 = 1×252 = 625
The maximum force will be exerted on the floor when the 1kg mass is at the lowest position, as the spring will be highly compressed and will push the bottom block.
So, total force on ground = 4g + kA + 1g
= 40 + 625*1.6*10-2 + 10
= 60 N

Now, someone asked me why I was adding the weight of the upper block ie. 1g as it isn't directly interacting with the 4 kg block. Only the spring force (and weight of 4kg block) are acting on the 4kg block, so the normal reaction should only depend on the two but not on the upper block. I don't know how to justify this even though I intuitively feel that the weight of the 1kg block should be added as it is part of the system. Can somebody provide a more rigorous explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a common mistake to include forces as acting on a body which is not directly subject to the force. It is certainly the case that all you should count here is the weight of the lower block and the spring compression. But, have you correctly calculated the spring compression force? You multiplied k by the amplitude.
Suppose the upper block is only executing very small gentle oscillations. Will the spring ever be under tension? What will your kA method calculate as the compression in the spring when the upper block is at its highest point?
 
Thank you! Got it.
The equilibrium position is itself shifted. Hence, when the system is in equilibrium, assuming that the spring is compressed by x0
kx0 = mg (m=1kg)
When it goes further down, i.e to the lowest position, the spring force on the block is
F = k(A+x0)
= kA + kx0
= kA + mg
This is why I was getting the right answer even though I hadn't really thought about it well.
 
erisedk said:
Thank you! Got it.
The equilibrium position is itself shifted. Hence, when the system is in equilibrium, assuming that the spring is compressed by x0
kx0 = mg (m=1kg)
When it goes further down, i.e to the lowest position, the spring force on the block is
F = k(A+x0)
= kA + kx0
= kA + mg
This is why I was getting the right answer even though I hadn't really thought about it well.
Well done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K