Energy Bands: Kronig-Penney Model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter torehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Kronig-Penney Model, specifically addressing the solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation within and outside a periodic potential. In the region of -b < x < 0, the potential V(x) = V0 leads to real exponential solutions, indicating wavefunction decay, while in the region of 0 < x < a, the potential V = 0 results in complex exponentials representing traveling waves. The boundary conditions applied yield a determinant condition for allowed energy values, which is crucial for understanding band structure diagrams as outlined in Kittel's 8th Edition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with the Kronig-Penney Model
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Concepts of allowed and forbidden energy values in band theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Kronig-Penney Model solutions
  • Learn about Bloch's Theorem and its implications for wavefunctions
  • Explore the concept of band structure diagrams in solid-state physics
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for solving second-order ordinary differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics, will benefit from this discussion, especially those interested in understanding energy bands and wavefunction behavior in periodic potentials.

torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
In Kronig-Penney Model we seek solutions for time independent Scrödinger equation inside and outside of the periodic potential.
Delta.png


for 0 < x < a;​
V(x) =
V0 for -b < x < 0​

My question is why solution of the KP Scrödinger equation in the region of -b &lt; x &lt; 0 doesnot have complex exponentials as in the region of 0 &lt; x &lt; a ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this region we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials (with real arguments). If you think about it physically, the wavefunction will also decay in this area, which can only happen if the argument of the exponential is real.
 
Niles said:
In this region we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {V_0 - E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />
The solution to this 2nd order ODE is a linear combination of exponentials.


OK, so what about first region?

<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = q^2 \psi,<br />

where
q^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.

Isn't it also 2.nd order ODE ?
 
In the region with V=0 we have
<br /> \frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} = -\hat k^2 \psi,<br />

where

<br /> \hat k^2 = \frac{{2m\left( {E} \right)}}{{\hbar ^2 }}.<br />

Solutions are traveling waves (going left and right).
 
Oh i see, I had some conceptual errors on writing the wave eq.
Thanks!
Torehan
 
I know that this topic doesn't take much attention of most of you as there are more interesting topics about paradoxes of physics but I need a little bit guidance about reproducing the band structure diagrams shown in Kittel , 170p in 8th Edition :)

So we have different wave solution for V0 region and 0 region,

\psi_{1}(x)=Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0&lt;x&lt;a

\psi_{2}(x)=Ce^{qx}+De^{-qx}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ for \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-b&lt;x&lt;0

After we apply the boundary conditions (usual QM boundary condiions in in square well potentials ),

\psi_{1}(0) = \psi_{2}(0) and \psi_{1}&#039;(0) = \psi_{2}&#039;(0)

\psi_{1}(a) = \psi_{2}(-b) and \psi_{1}&#039;(a) = \psi_{2}&#039;(-b)

Then, we have four equations

A+B=C+D

ik(A-B)=q(C-D)

Ae^{ika}+Be^{-ika}=(Ce^{-qb}+De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}

ik(Ae^{ika}-Be^{-ika})=q(Ce^{-qb}-De^{qb})e^{i\alpha(a+b)}

Determinant of the coefficients of this equation system mush vanish to have solutions. Than determinant yields,


([q^{2}-k^{2}]/2qk) sinh(qb)sin(ka) + cosh(qb)cosh(ka) = cos (\alpha(a+b))


Finally my issues
  • How can I define the allowed and forbidden energy values?
  • to be continued...


e^{i\alpha(a+b)} ---->The term \alpha came from Bloch's Theorem and (a+b) came from application of transitional symmetry operation to Bloch form wavefunction!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K