I Energy conditions and non-physical phenomena

Click For Summary
The discussion explores whether the inability to exceed the speed of light and the absence of energy creation from empty space are consequences of general relativity or derived from energy conditions necessary for solutions to Einstein's equations. It emphasizes that locally, nothing can exceed the speed of light, and energy cannot be generated from a vacuum in small volumes. The relationship between energy conditions and the stress-energy tensor is highlighted, indicating that these conditions prevent unphysical phenomena like superluminal energy propagation. Additionally, it notes that global energy conservation is not upheld in general relativity, as shown in FLRW cosmologies. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding energy conditions in the context of relativity.
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
Is the inability to exceed the speed of light a consequence of general relativity?
Is the fact that no energy is created from empty space a consequence of general relativity?
Or are they both constructions deriving from the energy conditions imposed to have solutions to Einstein's equations that are compatible with observations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
accdd said:
Is the inability to exceed the speed of light a consequence of general relativity?
You need to define what you mean by "exceeding the speed of light".
accdd said:
Is the fact that no energy is created from empty space a consequence of general relativity?
You need to define what you mean by "no energy is created from empty space".
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
Locally, nothing can exceed the speed of light.
If I take a small volume I don't expect it to generate stuff out of a vacuum.
 
accdd said:
Locally, nothing can exceed the speed of light.
This in essence follows from 4-momentum being non-spacelike.

accdd said:
If I take a small volume I don't expect it to generate stuff out of a vacuum.
This, in the form ##\nabla_\mu T^{\mu\nu}## is a direct consequence of varying the Einstein-Hilbert action with an additional term to describe the matter fields (and thereby generating the stress-energy tensor). The Einstein field equations resulting from varying the Einstein-Hilbert action are on the form ##G_{\mu\nu} = C T_{\mu\nu}##, where ##C## is a constant and the divergence of the Einstein tensor ##G_{\mu\nu}## is equal to zero.

However, "global" energy is generally not conserved in general relativity as demonstrated, e.g., by FLRW cosmologies.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
Sean Carroll in Spacetime and Geometry writes (4.6, last section):
[Energy conditions ... serve to prevent other properties that we think of as "unphysical", such as energy propagating faster than the speed of light...]
What does this means?
 
I suggest looking at the basic descriptions of different energy conditions in relativity. They are all concerned with the stress-energy tensor and are at varying degrees of strictness. For example, look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_condition under "Mathematical statement".

The statement that relates to the flow of energy is the dominant energy condition which relates to ##T_{ab} Y^b## where ##Y## is a time- or light-like vector field. The resulting 4-vector describes energy density and flow.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and accdd
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...