Energy conservative (Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of energy conservation in mechanics, specifically regarding the lifting of a book with a constant velocity. Participants clarify that when an object moves at constant velocity, the change in kinetic energy (K2 - K1) equals zero, while potential energy (U1 and U2) changes due to the work done against gravitational force. The equation W1-2 = U1 - U2 = K2 - K1 applies only in isolated systems without external forces. When non-conservative forces are present, the total work done is expressed as W_nc = ΔU + ΔK, highlighting the distinction between conservative and non-conservative work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy (K) and potential energy (U) concepts.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle and equations.
  • Knowledge of conservative and non-conservative forces in physics.
  • Basic grasp of mechanical energy conservation laws.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail, focusing on W = ΔK + ΔU.
  • Explore the differences between conservative and non-conservative forces.
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy calculations in various scenarios.
  • Investigate real-world applications of energy conservation in mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation principles in real-world applications.

MechaMZ
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


May i know how do i compute an energy conservative equation for the scenario below, which i don't understand.

If a book is lifted up by a force in order to make it moving upward with a constant velocity.
For conservation of total energy, W1-2 = U1-U2 = K2 - K1
If the object is moving in a constant velocity, isn't K2 - K1 = 0
However, U1 is not equal to U2.

It seems not correct obviously, hope someone could enlighten me.

I guess W1-2 = U1-U2 = K2 - K1 is only valid for isolated system, which should be a system without any external force involves except gravitational force.

I'm very confuse now, hope someone could help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
w=f.d
f=m.g
d=distance moved
earth does -ve work , you do equal +ve.


ok!

+ve change in potiential energy always needs external energy source.

so W=U2-U1=m.g.d
 
MechaMZ said:

Homework Statement


May i know how do i compute an energy conservative equation for the scenario below, which i don't understand.

If a book is lifted up by a force in order to make it moving upward with a constant velocity.
For conservation of total energy, W1-2 = U1-U2 = K2 - K1
If the object is moving in a constant velocity, isn't K2 - K1 = 0
However, U1 is not equal to U2.

It seems not correct obviously, hope someone could enlighten me.

The work done by non conservative forces (such as the lifting force on the book) is
W_{nc} = (U_2 - U_1) + (K_2 - K_1) or in its alternate form, W_{nc} = \Delta U + \Delta K

I guess W1-2 = U1-U2 = K2 - K1 is only valid for isolated system, which should be a system without any external force involves except gravitational force.

I'm very confuse now, hope someone could help me.
For a system subject to conservative forces only (like gravity or spring forces), then (U_2 - U_1) + (K_2 -K_1) = 0, or \Delta U + \Delta K =0, and the work done by such conservative forces is W_c = U_1- U_2, or W_c = - (\Delta U) in its alternate form.

For a system subjct to both conservative and non conservative forces, then the total work done by those forces is W_T = (K_2- K_1), or W_T= \Delta K

staraet's answer for the work done by the lifting force is also correct.

This can get confusing for sure, but actually, I'm not exactly sure what your question is. Mechanical Energy (U + K) is NOT conserved when non-conservative forces that do work are acting.
 
Last edited:
PhanthomJay said:
For a system subjct to both conservative and non conservative forces, then the total work done by those forces is W_T = (K_2- K_1), or W_T= \Delta K

why we no need to include the \Delta U? What if the object is in a falling motion with air resistive force acting on it.

Could i write it as: mg(\Delta h) - Ffriction(\Delta h) = \Delta K + \Delta U

or i should write it as without taking the work done by gravitational force: - Ffriction(\Delta h) = \Delta K +\Delta U
 
always think in terms of gain and loss

we some thing goes along only acting force , it gains k.e
so decreases its p.e

when ball falls, so it means, going along a force, so increases k.e (say after dt);
then if u find k.e is constant-- it means body has spent that k.e in either heat, vibrational,mass or something in that dt time.
then write equations. don't write before....

here friction is heat. so E spent in heat= mgh
 
I think my problem is I don't understand between work done, kinetic energy, and potential energy.
 
I suggest sticking with PhanthomJay's first equation:
PhanthomJay said:
The work done by non conservative forces (such as the lifting force on the book) is
W_{nc} = (U_2 - U_1) + (K_2 - K_1) or in its alternate form, W_{nc} = \Delta U + \Delta K.

As you realize for your example of lifting a book, K2=K1=0. Also, Wnc is the work W1-2 done by lifting, so in that case

W1-2 = U2 - U1

If instead we have an isolated system with only conservative forces such as gravity, we have Wnc = 0 and conservation of mechanical energy applies. PhanthomJay's equation then becomes:

0 = U2 - U1 + K2 - K1

this is often rewritten in the form

U1 + K1 = U2 + K2

and is simply a statement that the total energy (potential + kinetic) does not change.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K