Energy dependence on observer framework

[hokhani]

Does mechanical energy of a system depend on the framework of an observer (neglecting a constant)?

 

[Nugatory]

Does mechanical energy of a system depend on the framework of an observer (neglecting a constant)?

Yes. The kinetic energy of a bullet is zero in the frame of an observer who is at rest relative to the bullet, non-zero for an observer who is at rest relative to the target of the bullet.

 

[HallsofIvy]

I agree with Nugatory but I can't help but wonder what you mean by "neglecting a constant".

 

[hokhani]

I agree with Nugatory but I can't help but wonder what you mean by "neglecting a constant".

Ok, Right. The statement "neglecting a constant" is my mistake.
I clarify my purpose of the question:
Newton's laws are only valid in inertial framework. I like to know whether energy formalism is valid in non-inertial framework or not? In other words, can one solve the problems exactly, using conservation of energy in non-inertial framework?

 

[mattt]

Ok, Right. The statement "neglecting a constant" is my mistake.
I clarify my purpose of the question:
Newton's laws are only valid in inertial framework. I like to know whether energy formalism is valid in non-inertial framework or not? In other words, can one solve the problems exactly, using conservation of energy in non-inertial framework?

\int_{t_0}^{t_1}\vec{F}(t)\cdot\vec{v}(t)dt = \frac{1}{2}m v^2(t_1) - \frac{1}{2}m v^2(t_0) is valid in frames where \vec{F}(t) = m \frac{d\vec{v}(t)}{dt}

That is, in inertial frames.

You still can use it in non-inertial frames IF you add "inertial forces".


\int_{t_0}^{t_1}\vec{F}(t)\cdot\vec{v}(t)dt = U(x(t_0),y(t_0),z(t_0))- U(x(t_1),y(t_1),z(t_1)) is valid in any frame where \vec{F}(x,y,z) = -\nabla U(x,y,z)

where U(x,y,z) does not vary with time in this frame.