I Energy distribution plot of neutrinos in beta decay

Phys pilot
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
what's the shape and how I get the spectrum of the kinetic energy of the neutrinos?
Thanks
Hello,
When you have a beta decay you get the typical continuos spectrum representing counts against the kinetic energy of the electron. But what's the shape and how I get the spectrum of the kinetic energy of the neutrinos?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a 3 body problem, since there is a nucleus, an electron (beta particle) and an anti-neutrino. Given that the nucleus is massive, A * ~931.49 MeV, the beta and anti-neutrino will get most of the energy.

One can approximate the shape of the anti-neutrino spectrum by assuming the total energy of the beta decay, e.g., Eβ, and subtracting the beta energy spectrum. The anti-neutrino energy is approximately the total energy minus the beta energy. The most probably energy of a beta particle in the decay is about Eβ/3, and corresponding anti-neutrino energy would be ~2/3 Eβ.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Phys pilot
Astronuc said:
It's a 3 body problem, since there is a nucleus, an electron (beta particle) and an anti-neutrino. Given that the nucleus is massive, A * ~931.49 MeV, the beta and anti-neutrino will get most of the energy.

One can approximate the shape of the anti-neutrino spectrum by assuming the total energy of the beta decay, e.g., Eβ, and subtracting the beta energy spectrum. The anti-neutrino energy is approximately the total energy minus the beta energy. The most probably energy of a beta particle in the decay is about Eβ/3, and corresponding anti-neutrino energy would be ~2/3 Eβ.
I see, so the spectrum would be also continuos and a similar shape?
Thanks
 
Phys pilot said:
I see, so the spectrum would be also continuos and a similar shape?
Thanks
No, the shape for the neutrino would be continuous but complementary to the spectrum of the beta decay, so if the proportion of energy for the beta particle was given by f(E), then the function describing the anti-neutrino energy would be 1-f(E).

See this spectrum for beta particles - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/beta2.html

Draw a horizontal line across the top. The difference between the horizontal line and the curve for the beta particle intensity is approximately the anit-neutrino intensity. Plot the difference vs energy, and that is the anti-neutrino spectrum.
 
Astronuc said:
Draw a horizontal line across the top. The difference between the horizontal line and the curve for the beta particle intensity is approximately the anit-neutrino intensity. Plot the difference vs energy, and that is the anti-neutrino spectrum.
Huh? The difference between intensity at a given energy and the peak intensity isn't relevant.
If we neglect the recoil of the nucleus then the sum of electron and neutrino energy is constant, so you need to flip the graph across the vertical axis. The largest electron energy corresponds to the smallest neutrino energy and vice versa.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Astronuc
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top