Energy Equvalant of different masses

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ratchettrack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy equivalence of different masses, specifically comparing uranium and butter with the same number of electrons. It is established that while mass and energy are equivalent, they are not the same; uranium contains significant binding energy that can be released, unlike butter, which primarily consists of carbon and hydrogen with low binding energy. The concept of binding energy is further illustrated through the analogy of gravitational potential energy, where a person's energy increases when elevated above the Earth's surface due to the energy required to overcome gravitational binding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass-energy equivalence principles
  • Familiarity with binding energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of atomic structure and elements
  • Gravitational potential energy concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of mass-energy equivalence in physics
  • Study binding energy in nuclear physics, particularly in uranium
  • Explore the differences in energy release mechanisms between nuclear and chemical reactions
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its implications in physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy equivalence and binding energy in different materials.

ratchettrack
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to learn here. After all, you all know more about this stuff then I do. If you were to take a given mass of uranium and compare it to say, a mass of butter having the same number of electrons, do they both contain the same amount of energy if it could be released like in a bomb? I know it can't be released in the butter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass and energy are equivalent, but are not the same thing. Part of the mass in Uranium is in the binding energy. That energy is being released in the form of photons and a few bits and parts of elements flying off. In butter most of it is carbon (in weight) and hydrogen. Hydrogen can't be split, carbon has about the lowest binding energy so breaking that one up won't give much. Melting together the hydrogen into carbon would release quite a bit of energy, but conditions in a pack of butter do not favor such: hydrogen atoms are far too far away from each other in comparison with the bundle of protons/neutrons in Uranium (just about the distance as close you have to get those H atoms to each other to have a stable nucleuos)
 
Thanks Ger. If I may, I would like to put this in a form that helps me understand just what you are saying. Gravity holds my mass against the earth. There is an energy or potential difference between me on Earth and me out in space. My mass remains the same but when I'm on Earth I contain more energy. This is the energy required to separate me from the Earth as like binding energy. The farther I'm away from the earth, the less energy (binding energy) I contain. Am I out to lunch here?

Ratchettrack
 
My mass remains the same but when I'm on Earth I contain more energy.
Less. The binding energy subtracts from your total energy. To boost you into space I have to add energy, and now you contain more. If you should fall back >splat< that amount of energy is released.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K