Energy expended during static exercises

Click For Summary
Calculating energy expended during static exercises like hangs and handstands is complex due to zero displacement, which means no mechanical work is performed. While classical mechanics states that zero displacement equals zero work, energy is still consumed by the body to maintain muscle tension and resist gravity. This energy expenditure is often measured in metabolic equivalents (METs), which account for the biochemical processes occurring in active muscles. For example, a 60kg person uses approximately 1 MET while at rest, and exercise machines can estimate METs based on user weight. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the energy dynamics involved in static exercises.
Eric vdm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Trying to wrap my head around how to calculate the energy/power expended when doing static exercises (i.e. static hangs from rings or handstands etc.) for various intervals...

How do I relate the impulse (between myself and the rings or surface) to the total energy or work performed in say calories?

Thanks in advance.
Eric
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi
welcome to PF :smile:

Eric vdm said:
(i.e. static hangs from rings or handstands etc.)

Work = F x s (s = displacement)
since there is no displacement, there is no force and therefore no work is being performed

I'm not qualified to answer what biochemical actions /reactions are occurring in the muscles
maybe some one else can answer that
 
During static exercises the efficiency is zero. So energy is expended to do 0 work.
 
Thanks for your reply's.

I understand in classical mechanics zero displacement = zero work.

What I don't get is the energy expended in order to resit gravity alone.

I tried to calculate the gravitational potential energy between myself and the center of the earth...(G.m1.m2/R) but the answer is senseless.

Confusing o_O
 
No energy is required to resist gravity. E.g. a table can hold a book against gravity indefinitely using no energy.
 
Here is an applet: http://www.juststand.org/OnlineToolbox/tabid/637/Default.aspx

This applet takes a bioenergetics approach. Straight mechanics, like @Dale cites, is correct if you were a dead blob. Most of us are at least conscious blobs. Humans use food energy, consume oxygen, and generate CO2. Simply doing zero movement.

This energy consumption is typically stated in exercise physiology and medicine in terms of units called a MET, or metabolic equivalent.. To calculate this using standard Physics is complex to say the least. So measuring oxygen consumption works as a very easily measured and pretty accurate proxy for this energy use.
There are standards for determining this value, so you can use tables to get an approximate value.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolic_equivalent.

So, simply sitting still, for a 60kg human, uses ~1 MET. Illness or trauma affects this value, for example.
Exercise machines in gyms, like treadmills, often have an option to enter your weight and show a running estimate of METs as you exercise. Example: Prescribed exercise may expect you to shoot for 3.0 METs, so if you exercise at that rate for one hour you have 3 * 60 = 180 MET minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
As child, before I got my first X-ray, I used to fantasize that I might have a mirror image anatomy - my heart on the right, my appendix on the right. Why not? (Caveat: I'm not talking about sci-fi molecular-level mirroring. We're not talking starvation because I couldn't process certain proteins, etc.) I'm simpy tlakng about, when a normal zygote divides, it technically has two options which way to form. Oen would expcet a 50:50 split. But we all have our heart on the left and our...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
641