Energy levels in Hydrogen - derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of energy levels in hydrogen using the Hamiltonian operator, defined as H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r}. The wavefunction is expressed as ψ=R(r)Y(θ, φ), where R(r) is a specific radial function. Participants confirm that while evaluating the integral E=<ψ|H|ψ> is a valid approach, there are shortcuts available for calculating expectation values of the Hamiltonian, particularly using tabulated values for eigenstates. The conversation emphasizes that direct evaluation of the integral is not the standard method and suggests that the integrals involved, while tedious, are manageable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Hamiltonian operators
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and eigenstates in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Experience with integration techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the use of tabulated expectation values for hydrogen eigenstates
  • Learn about the properties of the raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the derivation of energy levels in the hydrogen atom using the Schrödinger equation
  • Explore advanced integration techniques relevant to quantum mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, atomic physics, or anyone involved in deriving energy levels in quantum systems.

Grand
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We know that:

E=&lt;\psi|H|\psi&gt;

where
H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 - \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r}
and
\psi=R(r)Y(\theta, \phi)
with
R(r)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(2n)!}}(\frac{2Z}{na_0})^{3/2}\left(\frac{2Zr}{na_0}\right)^{n-1}e^{-Zr/na_0}
If I want to find the energy, do I just evaluate this integral over all space? I started doing it, but it becomes very untidy at a point - I just wanted to ask if this is the method.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mod Note: moved to advanced physics. Please post such a question in that forum.
 
Essentially yes. However, there are shortcuts you can take to evaluate expectation values of the Hamiltonian. Is psi in an eigenstate (discrete portion of the spectrum), no integral necessary. Likewise for a weighted sum of eigenstates.
 
Psi is a wavefunction, and an eigenstate - but I believe it has to be an integral. However, can you tell me what these shortcuts are?
 
Tabulated (as a result of integrations on which you needn't worry) values for

\langle nlm |\frac{1}{r} | nlm \rangle(nlm are eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian) exist and ease your work.
 
Last edited:
I know these values - for inverse 1st, 2nd and 3rd powers - my concern is the first term - the one involving the differential - it is going to produce 2 integrals on its own.
 
NO, this is most definitely not the standard method. Do you know what eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are?
 
Yes, I do ofc. I know how to find the energy by requiring the raising operator to terminate the circular orbit wavefunction, I was just wondering is you can do it by directly evaluating this integral.
 
Grand said:
I know how to find the energy by requiring the raising operator to terminate the circular orbit wavefunction,

This is surely not the standard way. Please do demonstrate.
 
  • #10
Grand said:
I know these values - for inverse 1st, 2nd and 3rd powers - my concern is the first term - the one involving the differential - it is going to produce 2 integrals on its own.
So what specifically is the problem? These aren't particularly tricky integrals. They're straightforward but tedious. Show us what you've done so far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K