Energy lost in rolling, sliding and torsion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy dynamics in three states of motion: rolling, sliding, and torsion, particularly focusing on a steel cylinder interacting with a rubber surface. Participants explore the work done in each scenario and the factors influencing energy loss.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Phil questions whether the work done in rolling a steel cylinder over a rubber surface is simply the horizontal force times distance, assuming no friction in the axis.
  • Some participants suggest that the work done in rolling and torsion is often considered low or zero due to the lack of resisting force under the assumption of no axis-cylinder friction.
  • In the case of sliding, the work done is proposed to be the product of distance and the frictional force between the cylinder and the surface.
  • Phil introduces the idea that the deformation of the rubber surface during rolling, sliding, and torsion may affect the energy dynamics, implying that the work done in rolling could be non-zero due to this deformation.
  • Participants inquire about general formulas applicable to each case, regardless of whether the work is zero or non-zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the work done in rolling and torsion, with some suggesting it is negligible while others argue that deformation of the rubber surface complicates the assessment, indicating a lack of consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about friction and deformation that may not be universally applicable, and the implications of these factors on the work done are not fully resolved.

qmul
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Energy "lost" in rolling, sliding and torsion

Hey everybody,

I have a question concerning three states and the state of energy in them.

1. Rolling
2. Sliding
3. Torsion

For example:

If I have a steel cylinder with diameter d on an axis (no friction in the axis) rolling horizontally over a rubber surface, is the energy (work done), just the simple horizontal force in the axis times distance?
What happens, if I block the cylinder and slide it over the surface? Third question would be just to rotate the cylinder without horizontal movement at all.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated ;-)

Phil

EDIT: defined the contacting surfaces. Surface cylinder = steel, 2nd Surface = rubber block.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi qmul, welcome to PF. The work done in the first and third cases is relatively low and often assumed to be zero; the reason is that there is essentially no resisting force under your assumption of no axis-cylinder friction.

The work done in the second case is the product of the distance and the frictional force between the cylinder and the surface. Does this answer your question?
 


Mapes said:
Hi qmul, welcome to PF. The work done in the first and third cases is relatively low and often assumed to be zero; the reason is that there is essentially no resisting force under your assumption of no axis-cylinder friction.

The work done in the second case is the product of the distance and the frictional force between the cylinder and the surface. Does this answer your question?

Thank you for your fast reply Mapes!

To complicate maters - the surface is rubber and steel for the cylinder. So there is quite a bit of deformation done to the rubber while rolling / sliding / torsion. The force for rolling, measured in the axis, is significantly lower than in sliding. I guess these new factors will change the question, slightly, don't they?
 


Sure, they'd imply a non-zero work for the first case, which is what you observed.
 


are there some general formulas for each of the cases - no matter if it is zero-or non-zero work?
 


Yes:

[tex]P=Fv[/tex]

[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

[tex]F=\mu_k N[/tex]

where P is power, F is the resisting frictional force, v is velocity, d is distance, [itex]\mu_k[/itex] is the coefficient of kinetic (moving) friction, and N is the weight of the moving object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K