Energy-Momentum Tensor for a particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formal definition of the energy-momentum tensor for a point particle, specifically addressing the integration of the action over a 4-volume to derive the tensor. The participants reference two academic papers, highlighting the need for a Lagrangian density instead of the standard action for a point particle in special relativity (SR). The appearance of the Dirac delta function is explained as a necessary component to isolate the particle's worldline within the 4-volume integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of energy-momentum tensors
  • Knowledge of special relativity (SR)
  • Basic grasp of Dirac delta functions in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor from Lagrangian densities
  • Explore the role of Dirac delta functions in field theory
  • Review the action principle in the context of general relativity
  • Investigate the implications of energy-momentum tensors in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on classical field theory and general relativity.

PML
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I was studying how to define, formally, an energy-momentum tensor for a point particle.

I was reading this two references:http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/Physics411/html/page2/files/Lecture.19.pdf , page 1; and http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol29/pdf/v29p1033.pdf page 1038.

They both start from an action that I understand, it's just the action for a particle moving in space time. They, then, differentiate the action with respect to the metric to get the energy-momentum tensor, but then, somehow, they arrive at an expression that has the dirac delta in it...
Can anyone help me out?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PML said:
They, then, differentiate the action with respect to the metric to get the energy-momentum tensor, but then, somehow, they arrive at an expression that has the dirac delta in it...

That's because, as noted on page 2 of your first reference, the action in question needs to be a Lagrangian density, i.e., something you integrate over a 4-volume; but equation 19.1 of that paper, the usual action for a point particle in SR, is not a Lagrangian density. The delta function comes in when you try to make it one (basically because you have to pick out just the points in the 4-volume that lie on the point particle's worldline).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
992
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K