Energy of the summation of two sinusoidal waves

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the energy associated with the summation of two sinusoidal waves, specifically in the context of laser diodes transmitting light that interferes constructively. Participants explore the implications of wave interference on energy conservation and the relationship between amplitude and power in wave phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the sum of the energies of two waves does not equal the energy of their sum, seeking clarification on this issue.
  • Another participant explains that the total irradiance at the point of constructive interference can be greater than the sum of the individual irradiances, potentially reaching four times the original power under certain conditions.
  • A different participant questions how the doubling of power at the point of interference aligns with the principle of conservation of energy.
  • One contributor emphasizes that interference occurs over a finite area, leading to variations in energy density, with some regions exhibiting energy less than the sum of the two sources and others showing greater energy.
  • Another participant uses an analogy of a hose to illustrate how interference redistributes energy rather than creating or destroying it.
  • A participant asserts that doubling the amplitude of a wave results in a quadrupling of power, which is a fundamental property of waves, and clarifies that this does not violate conservation of energy.
  • One contributor reiterates that interference redistributes energy across the wave rather than altering the total energy output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how energy conservation applies in the context of wave interference, with some asserting that energy is redistributed while others question the implications of increased power at points of constructive interference. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the fundamental question of energy conservation in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the dependence of energy calculations on definitions of power and amplitude, as well as the spatial characteristics of interference patterns, which may not be fully addressed in the discussion.

O.J.
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have two laser diodes that are made to transmit light at the same wavelength and intensity. Also, suppose that we place them in an open space and separate them by a distance such that when their generated beams intersect at one point in space and one point only. Further suppose that they add constructively at that point.

Laser 1 = A sin wt
Laser 2 = A sin wt

Laser 1 + Laser 2 = 2 A sin wt

However the sum of the energies of the two waves does not equal the energy of the sum of the total. Can someone clarify that? It's been bugging me for a while.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Long story short, energy from an optical (electromagnetic) source is proportional to the irradiance at the point of measurement, in your case the point of constructive interference. The irradiance at the point of measurement is given by I_total = I_1 + I_2 + 2*sqrt(I_1*I_2)*cos(phase_1 - phase_2) where I_1 and I_2 are the irradiance of source 1 and 2 respectively. So the energy can actually be 4 times the original power of the source if I_1 = I_2 and w_1 = w_2, this is due to the phenomena of superposititon.

Brief source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle

But a mechanics book like Taylor will have a pretty thorough expose on the topic.

Cheers,
IR
 
The energy (or power really) at the point of interference is twice the total energy/power of the two waves. How does that work in light of conservation of energy?
 
The interference take place in a finite area of space not at a geometric point.
You will have maxima and minima of interference. In some areas the energy is less than the sum of the two, in others is larger.
The total energy (over the whole area) is just the sum of the two energies.
 
Lasers put out a certain definite (more or less) power over a certain amount of time or space (depending on the situation or what you are interested in). Think of the laser as a hose with a fixed flow, ignoring the incompressibility of water, you can think of interference as a repositioning of power sort of like taking the hose and running the water through a funnel which concentrates the flow of water. So a fixed amount gets concentrated to a more specific area, this is what interference does.

Cheers,
IR
 
My question is very fundamental: adding two sinusoids in phase results in a sinusoid with twice the total energy of both sinusoids combined according to how we calculate power as A^2/2 with A being the amplitude. None of this answers the extremely fundamental question of how is energy conserved??!
 
The "fundamental" answer is that if you double the amplitude of a wave, the power increases by a factor of 4.
This has nothing to do with conservation of energy. It's a "fundamental" property of waves. You need to use 4 times more power to double the amplitude.

If you are thinking of "interference" of two waves that are in phase everywhere this simply means that you have a single source and you just double the amplitude.

If you have two separate waves, produced by two sources, you cannot overlap them in phase everywhere in space. You will have maxima as well as minima.
 
To put it another way, interference doesn't destroy or create energy. It simply redistributes the energy. Some of the energy is "moved" to other parts of the wave, from where it would have been if there had been no interference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K