Energy, power and staying still.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fallen Seraph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the power required for an object to hover involves understanding the relationship between lift and force, specifically the force needed to counteract gravity (mg). While rockets and helicopters have straightforward calculations for power based on thrust and momentum, hovering with a balloon requires no power at all. The discussion emphasizes that there is no universal minimum power requirement for hovering; it depends on the method of propulsion. For example, by manipulating exhaust velocity and mass ejection rate, one can theoretically achieve hovering with minimal power, albeit for short durations. Ultimately, the power calculations are highly dependent on the specific hovering method employed.
Fallen Seraph
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the power required for an object to hover. So I need to find the power needed to maintain an upwards force of mg on the object (not using any fixed object, relying on the air for Newton's third law) , and I'd much rather do it without considering the object's method of propulsion..



The Attempt at a Solution



No equations i can find are suitable and the fact that the object won't move leaves me very confused wrt units. I can't see where I'm going to pull Nm/s as a unit out of, but intuitively it requires energy to stay up in the air...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can hover in a rocket, or a balloon or a helicopter. For the first two cases the calculation is straightforward.

For a rocket, the lift is given by the momentum of the expelled matter per second, i.e. rate of change of momentum. If this is equal to mg you'll hover.
 
Indeed, but is there no way to determine the minimum power required, regardless of the method of hovering used?
 
There is no minimum power required. The balloon uses zero. Even the 'helicopter' can use arbitrarily small amounts of power if it is allowed to have arbitrarily large 'rotors'.
 
You have to consider the method of elevation. For instance, hovering in a balloon requires no power.

If you assume your rocket is perfect then the calculation above can be taken as a minimum requirement.
 
Even for the rocket you can't pin down a minimum power without other considerations. You can write the thrust force as v*dm/dt where v is the exhaust velocity and dm/dt is the rate of exhaust mass ejection. Power is (1/2)*v^2*dm/dt. So by making v very small and dm/dt very large you can hover at as low a power as you wish. Of course, you can't do it for very long. This is basically the flight strategy of taking an anvil with you as fuel and then when it's time to hover, dropping it and trying to stand on it.
 
Dick, thanks for clarifying that.

Power is (1/2)*v^2*dm/dt. So by making v very small and dm/dt very large you can hover at as low a power as you wish

I don't see the logic here because there's a constraint that the lift force must be above a certain minimum.
 
Set v*dm/dt=M*g (M is the mass of the rocket - which will start changing but we don't worry about that because we aren't concerned with hovering for any significant period of time). Then v=(M*g)/(dm/dt). So power P is proportional to 1/(dm/dt). Sending v to zero and dm/dt to infinity gives a fixed force for arbitrarily small power (albeit also for arbitrarily small times). PS. I've given this a lot of thought - a biologist buddy used to try to convince me there MUST be a minimum power requirement.
 
Back
Top