Energy-related problem involving skiing up a hill

In summary, the problem asks to find the maximum height above the foot of the hill that a 68kg skier, with an initial speed of 15m/s, will reach. The hill has a slope of 40 degrees and coefficients of static and kinetic friction of 0.75 and 0.25, respectively. Using conservation of energy and the work-energy theorem, the equation mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + W can be used to solve for the unknown height, y. The displacement along the hillside is represented by s = y/sin40o, allowing for the calculation of work. This method will result in an equation with only one unknown, y, providing the answer sought in the problem
  • #1
Emethyst
118
0

Homework Statement


A 68kg skier approaches the foot of a hill with a speed of 15m/s. The surface of the hill slopes up at 40 degrees above the horizontal and has the coefficients of static and kinetic friction of 0.75 and 0.25, respectively. Use energy conservation to find the maximum height above the foot of the hill that the skier will reach.


Homework Equations


Conservation of energy, work-energy theorem



The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to solve this question; since there is friction present in the system I decided to use the work-energy theorem, thus making: Ef = Ei + W, or mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + W. The problem I'm running into is trying to figure out how to calculate a value for W seeming as there are no displacement values given in the question. How would I go about getting an answer for W, or is this the wrong way to go about this question? Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Call the height that you are looking for y. The displacement along the hillside (for purposes of calculating work) is s = y / sin40o. So if you use the work energy theorem, you will have an equation involving only one unknown, y.
 
  • #3


Hello,

Thank you for sharing your attempt at solving the energy-related problem involving skiing up a hill. It is great that you have recognized the presence of friction and have decided to use the work-energy theorem to approach this question. However, you are right in saying that there is a missing value for W, which represents the work done by friction.

To solve this problem, we can use the concept of conservation of energy. This states that the total energy of a system remains constant, meaning the initial energy (Ei) is equal to the final energy (Ef). In this case, the initial energy is the kinetic energy (1/2)mv^2 of the skier, and the final energy is the potential energy (mgh) at the maximum height reached by the skier.

We can set up an equation using these values: (1/2)mv^2 = mgh. We can cancel out the mass (m) on both sides of the equation, leaving us with v^2 = 2gh. We can then solve for h by substituting the given values for v (15m/s) and g (9.8m/s^2), giving us h = 11.47m.

However, this is not the final answer because we need to take into account the work done by friction. We can calculate this by multiplying the coefficient of kinetic friction (0.25) by the normal force (mgcosθ) and the displacement (h/sinθ) of the skier up the hill, giving us: W = 0.25mgcosθ(h/sinθ).

Substituting the values, we get W = 1.74mg. We can then add this value to the potential energy at the maximum height (mgh) to get the final energy, which is equal to the initial kinetic energy. We can set up an equation: (1/2)mv^2 = mgh + W. Substituting the values, we get: (1/2)(68)(15)^2 = (68)(9.8)(11.47) + 1.74(68)(9.8). Solving for h, we get h = 11.71m.

Therefore, the maximum height above the foot of the hill that the skier will reach is approximately 11.71m. I hope this helps in your understanding of energy conservation and solving problems involving friction.
 

1. What are some common energy-related problems that skiers face when skiing up a hill?

Skiers may experience fatigue, muscle soreness, and shortness of breath due to the physical exertion required to ski up a hill. They may also encounter issues with insufficient energy reserves and difficulty maintaining a consistent pace.

2. How does skiing up a hill require more energy than skiing on a flat surface?

When skiing up a hill, the skier must not only propel themselves forward, but also upwards against the force of gravity. This requires the use of more muscles and energy compared to skiing on a flat surface where the skier can rely on gravity to assist with forward movement.

3. What factors affect the amount of energy needed to ski up a hill?

The steepness and length of the hill, the weight and fitness level of the skier, and the type of skis and boots being used can all impact the amount of energy needed to ski up a hill. Weather conditions such as wind and snow can also affect the difficulty and energy required.

4. How can skiers conserve energy while skiing up a hill?

Skiers can conserve energy by using efficient skiing techniques such as making smooth, consistent turns and maintaining a steady pace. They can also use their poles for extra propulsion and take breaks when needed to rest and recharge.

5. Are there any strategies for improving energy efficiency when skiing up a hill?

Yes, there are several strategies that can help improve energy efficiency when skiing up a hill. These include staying hydrated and well-fueled before and during skiing, using proper skiing equipment and clothing that is appropriate for the weather conditions, and maintaining good form and body positioning while skiing.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
882
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
947
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
982
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
979
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top