Engineering Statics Equilibrium System Question

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an engineering statics problem involving equilibrium of a beam system. The user has drawn a free body diagram (FBD) and established equilibrium equations, focusing on forces in the vertical direction and moments about point A. They express concern about potentially incorrect results and the absence of a weight variable (W) in their final equation. Other participants confirm that the absence of W maintains unit consistency in the solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying forces and moments in statics problems.
Temp0
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/VFb5rwj.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


First, I drew the FBD for the system, one horizontal force at A, one force perpendicular to the beam at B, and the weight.
Writing out the equilibrium equations:
The sum of forces in the y direction should be 0, so I have the equation:
Nb cos(θ) - W = 0, which can be rearranged for Nb later on.
Then I took the moment about point A:
Nb (a/cosθ) - Wcosθ (L/2) = 0
Eventually, it simplifies out to cos^-1 ( (2a/L) ^(1/3) ) = θ

I don't think I got the right answer, but can someone help me identify my error? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think you have the wrong answer?
 
IDK, it looks just so completely wrong. and also it says that describe it in terms of w, a, and l and I have no w.
 
Would changing W also change θ?

Also your answer is consistent with the units. If W was in the solution then the units would get screwed up.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hmm, I suppose you're right, thank you for the replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K