Enthelpy of Dissolution vs. Enthelpy of Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wailing Fungus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Enthalpy of dissolution refers to the heat change when a solute dissolves in a solvent, while enthalpy of solution is often used interchangeably but can imply different conditions or states. In the lab, measured enthalpy changes for dissolution may differ from literature values due to experimental conditions or inaccuracies. Negative enthalpy values indicate an exothermic process, but endothermic reactions can also yield negative values if calculated incorrectly. The confusion may stem from the specific definitions or contexts in which these terms are used. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate thermodynamic analysis in experiments.
Wailing Fungus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between enthalpy of dissolution and enthalpy of solution?

I have a lab where I have to measure the change in enthalpy of dissolution of several salts in water. I found the change in enthalpy, however I am supposed to compare them with the real values. I looked in the CRC handbook and there was only a table with changes in enthalpies of solution, these were different values than the ones I got.

Another thing that I do not undestand is that my reactions were endothermic but my enthalpies of dissolution were all negative. Doesn't enthalpy change indicate if a reaction is exothermic or endothermic? Unless enthalpy of dissolution indicates something else. I used the following equations:

q = CdT where C is the calorimeter constant

then

dH = q / n where dH is the change in enthalpy of dissolution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Negative values indicate a release of energy and exothermicity. Enthalpy of solution and dissolution are the same thing- heat change when one mole of solute dissolves
 
Are you serious?
 
No I'm lying.
 
You shouldn't lie Cesium, it's probably against some policy here. Hehe.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top