Epsilon-delta proof for a limit of a troublesome function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the epsilon-delta proof for the limit of the function limx→0(1/(x2-1))=-1. The user explores the conditions under which |((1/(x2-1)) +1)|<ε holds true, ultimately determining that δ=min{1, 2(ε)0.5}. The discussion highlights the importance of keeping x away from the asymptotes at x=-1 and x=1 to ensure the limit is valid. The user questions the necessity of restricting x to positive values and receives clarification on the behavior of the function near these critical points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Familiarity with the behavior of rational functions near asymptotes
  • Knowledge of modulus and its properties in inequalities
  • Basic graphing skills for visualizing function behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in more depth
  • Learn about the behavior of rational functions near vertical asymptotes
  • Explore techniques for estimating limits involving rational expressions
  • Review examples of epsilon-delta proofs for various functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering the concepts of limits and epsilon-delta proofs in calculus.

thenthanable
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
limx→01/(x2-1)=-1

0<|x|<δ and |((1/(x2-1)) +1)<ε

Working on the second equation, I eventually got
|x|< (ε|x-1||x+1|)0.5
Suppose I restrict |x|<1
-1<x<1,
then
0<x+1<2 → |x+1|<2
-2<x-1<0 → 0<1-x<2 → |1-x|=|x-1|<2 (Is this step correct? In one of the textbooks, it says that we must always have x>0 which is important to conclude that for example, |x-1|<2 in the context of this question. Unfortunately, I don't see why we must conclude that x>0 because doesn't the modulus get rid of all negative values?)

So my choice for δ works out to be δ=min{1,2(ε)0.5}

However when I work backwards the problem arises.
Suppose I choose δ=1 → 2(ε)0.5 > 1 → ε>0.25

When I draw the graph, my δ-range of x=0 starts from the asymptote at x=-1 to the other asymptote x=1, and if this is the case, doesn't that mean the range ε about f(x)=-1 is infinite?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have$$
\left |\frac 1 {x^2-1}+1\right |=\left | \frac {1+x^2-1}{x^2-1}\right |= \left |\frac{x^2}{x^2-1}\right |$$which you want to make small. The numerator will be small as ##x\to 0## but if ##x## gets anywhere near ##\pm 1##, that denominator will make the fraction large. So you must keep ##x## away from ##\pm 1##. That is easy since you have ##x\to 0##. So start by restricting ##|x|<\frac 1 2##. Figure out the smallest ##|x^2-1|## can be and overestimate ##\frac{x^2}{|x^2-1|}## by putting that smallest value in the denominator. Then you will be ready to figure out ##\delta## to make it all less than ##\epsilon##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K