Eq: Find Location of q3 for Net Force = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter leon1127
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three point charges arranged along the x-axis, with the goal of determining the position of a positive charge q_3 such that the net force acting on it is zero. The charges q_1 and q_2 have specified magnitudes and positions, while the location of q_3 is to be found, excluding trivial solutions at infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the problem, including the distances involved and the forces acting on q_3. Some express confusion about the mathematical relationships and the implications of their calculations, particularly regarding the placement of q_3 and the conditions for equilibrium.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided diagrams and attempted to derive equations, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made in their calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with imaginary results in their calculations, indicating possible misunderstandings about the placement of q_3 relative to the other charges. There is also mention of the need to consider the relative magnitudes of the charges when determining the position of q_3.

leon1127
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Three point charges are arranged along the x-axis. Charge q_1=−4.05 nC is located at x_1 = 0.195 m, and charge q_2 = 2.80 nC is at x_2=−0.340 m A positive point charge q_3 is located at the origin.Where along the x-axis can q_3 be placed and the net force on it be zero, other than the trivial answers of x= \pm \infty?
Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
show some work.

how do you think it should be solved?
 
\frac{4.05* q_3}{(-0.34-x)^2} =\frac{-2.8 * q_3}{(0.195+x)^2} [\tex]<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t know why it doesn&#039;t work
 
Last edited:
may anyone?
 
draw the diagram:

|------x2-----------------------x----------------x1----------|

if x is some value, then to find the distance, you have to use the distances as (x-x2) and (x1-x)
 
how do you know if x will land in the interval between q_1 and q_2 [\tex]<br /> the problem i get is when i assume the q3 will at equalibrium, x become imaginary when i take the square root<br /> <br /> 2.8/x^2 == -4.05 / (0.535+x)^2<br /> <br /> i have shifted the system to the right. Then the negative sign became PAIN under the square root
 
Last edited:
crap.

i'm sorry, i didn't read the question carefully enough. as far as i can tell, it has to be either left of q_2 or right of q_1. just from eyeballing the figure, it looks like it will be to the left of q_2 because the smaller repelling charge needs to be closer to cancel out the larger attracting charge.
 
nvm i got it.
Thank you everyone
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K