Equation of motion and Calculus

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of calculus to the equation of motion, specifically the formula s=ut+1/2at^2. The original poster expresses confusion regarding differentiation and its relationship to integration, as well as the conditions for finding minimum displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation of the displacement function and the conditions for finding maximum and minimum values. There is a debate about the necessity of integration before differentiation, and some participants reflect on their previous experiences with quadratic equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their understanding and questioning assumptions about calculus. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation process, but there is no explicit consensus on the necessity of prior calculus knowledge for solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note varying levels of familiarity with calculus, with some expressing concern about their preparedness for applying these concepts in their coursework. There is an acknowledgment that the original poster has just begun their calculus studies.

Jamie S
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
HW Template missing as it was moved from another forum
Hi all,

I started a level 3 btech in mech engineering and today was my first physics class. All went well apart from the tricky question at the end of class.

I thought it was a good idea to ask the question "how much harder can this be from last year".
Turns out for me not being brilliant at calculus it can be much harder.

The question surrounded the formula s=ut+1/2at^2
I was asked to differentiate s with respect to t, and show displacement is a minimum when u= - at

Off course it was a disaster and i laughed it off has not being forced to answer the question at which point other pupils attempted it.

We never did have it explained fully but it has made me wonder how one would go about answering this using differentiation. I've used algebra and transposed the formula before but this is the first time I've seen it this way.

It all got a little bit more confusing when someone suggested that it can't be differentiated until its been integrated. Is there any truth in this?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamie S said:
We never did have it explained fully but it has made me wonder how one would go about answering this using differentiation
Well, you are given displacement as a function of t. Can you take the derivative? (How do you find the max / min values of a function using calculus?)

Jamie S said:
It all got a little bit more confusing when someone suggested that it can't be differentiated until its been integrated. Is there any truth in this?
No idea what that is supposed to mean. Ignore it.
 
the only time I've taken min and max values was by using a quadratic equation
 
Jamie S said:
the only time I've taken min and max values was by using a quadratic equation
This will be easier.
 
using quadratic formula was suggested however it was insisted that differentiation be used.

im looking at my notes from mondays math and the handout i received with calculus rules.
isnt the derivative of a function normally dy/dx = ...
in this case would that be;
ds/dt = ut+1/2at^2
 
Jamie S said:
in this case would that be;
ds/dt = ut+1/2at^2

No, that right hand side is s, not ds/dt. You start with the function s, which is given, and take the derivative.
 
i don't quite follow
 
Jamie S said:
using quadratic formula was suggested however it was insisted that differentiation be used.

im looking at my notes from mondays math and the handout i received with calculus rules.
isnt the derivative of a function normally dy/dx = ...
in this case would that be;
ds/dt = ut+1/2at^2
Or, more to the point, if s = ut + (1/2)*a*t2 and you take the derivative of s with respect to t to find ds/dt, you must do the same to the right hand side of the equation.
 
Are you saying that you have not yet had calculus?

Chet
 
  • #10
ive had one mathematics class up to now. very little on my level 2.
 
  • #11
you no i am aware that i will need to improve drastically if I am to ever progress from this level. at the moment through we've not touched on any calculus though we have only just enrolled monday.
 
  • #12
Here's what I understand from what you said in your previous two posts: You never had calculus in any of your courses before, and today is only your second day in a calculus course. If that is the case, then you are not going to be able to solve this problem using calculus.

Chet
 
  • #13
Chestermiller... I take your comments and while i may or may not have had enough time using calculus my initial intention was never to solve this equation. I did however ask about it because i was curious of how it would be solved using the calculus method. It isn't homework or course work, i at least hope so given I've just started the course so i didnt see were there would be hesitation to answer.

I thank all that have made the effort to comment and suggest solutions.
 
  • #14
Jamie S said:
Chestermiller... I take your comments and while i may or may not have had enough time using calculus my initial intention was never to solve this equation. I did however ask about it because i was curious of how it would be solved using the calculus method. It isn't homework or course work, i at least hope so given I've just started the course so i didnt see were there would be hesitation to answer.

I thank all that have made the effort to comment and suggest solutions.
Hi Jamie,

I'm proud of your aggressiveness for being so interested in seeing how calculus might be applied to problem, even before you have studied calculus. Bravo. My advice is to just be patient and, in almost no time (probably in just a few weeks), you will be be solving problems like this on your own. Best of luck in your calculus course.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K