Understanding Kinematics for Inertial to Body Conversion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of modeling kinematics for an inertial navigation system using Simulink, particularly the conversion from inertial to body coordinates. The user seeks clarification on how to transform initial position and velocity into inertial coordinates and the necessity of this conversion. It is emphasized that working in an inertial coordinate system simplifies the process due to conservation laws and the absence of fictitious forces. The conversation also touches on the integration of body accelerations to derive inertial position and orientation. Overall, a clear understanding of quaternion rotations and the steps involved in the conversion process is crucial for successful simulation.
Pikapi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey Everyone,

I basically need a crash course on kinematics as I am trying to model this in simulink. I am given an intial set of position, velocity, ECI to Body Quaternion and suppose to convert into rotational rate and linear acceleration. Can anyone explain what i need to do? I tried looking it up but honestly the equations are above me. It seems that I am also suppose to convert from inertial to body but i am not sure why and how i am suppose to do this. I'm an EE and not mechanical so please bear with me, it's been a while since i worked with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I should also explain that this is to simulate an inertial navigation system.
 
If you don't understand how quaternion rotations work, you have two options. Either learn linear algebra, which will take a while, or find someone else to do the work for you. There is no shortcut for this problem.
 
Actually i do know how to work with linear algebra, but I'm confused on what steps I need to take. For example, when given an initial position and velocity, do we need to first transform them into inertial coordinates and why do we need them in inertial coordinates?
 
It's always easier to work with these things in inertial coordinate system. For one thing, you have conservation laws on your side. For another, no fictitious forces.

So what exactly do you have, in terms of running variables, and what exactly are you trying to do? Usually, INS gives you body accelerations and you integrate these to inertial position and orientation. Is that what you are trying to do, or are you trying to solve the reverse problem? Given coordinates/orientation try to simulate what INS is going to measure?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top