MHB Finding the Equation of a Line Given a Point and Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the equation of a line that passes through the point (6, 2) with the same slope as the line represented by the equation 3x + 4y = 12, first solve for y to determine the slope. The slope from the equation is -3/4. Using the point-slope formula, substitute the slope and the point (6, 2) into the equation. This results in the equation y = (-3/4)x + 13/2. The final equation accurately represents the desired line.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line that passes through (6, 2) and has the same slope as the line 3x + 4y = 12.

1. Solve the given equation for y. The coefficient of x is the slope.

Yes?

2. I then plug the slope and given point into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

True?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Find an equation of the line that passes through (6, 2) and has the same slope as the line 3x + 4y = 12.

1. Solve the given equation for y. The coefficient of x is the slope.

Yes?

Yes.

RTCNTC said:
2. I then plug the slope and given point into the point-slope formula and solve for y.

True?

That's one way to do it, so yes, that's true.
 
(6, 2) and 3x + 4y = 12.

3x + 4y = 12

4y = -3x + 12

y = (-3/4)x + 12/4

y = (-3/4)x + 3

The slope is (-3/4).

y - 2 = (-3/4)(x - 6)

y - 2 = (-3/4)x + (18/4)

y = (-3/4)x + (18/4) + 2

y = (-3/4)x + (13/2)

Correct?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top