Equation - Wave Equation Derivation Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of the wave equation and the correct application of partial derivatives. It clarifies that the general solution of the homogeneous wave equation in one spatial and one temporal dimension can be expressed as f(t,x)=f_1(x-ct)+f_2(x+ct). The substitution of variables u_1=x-ct and u_2=x+ct is utilized to derive the wave equation in a simplified form. The chain rule is applied to show that the wave equation can be expressed as a second-order partial differential equation. Ultimately, the integration process leads to the conclusion that the wave equation has two arbitrary functions that are at least twice differentiable.
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
equation -- Wave Equation Derivation Question

Hello, my teacher says that if, on a wave equation

f(x-ct)=f(e) then
\partial_{ee}= \partial_{tt}- c^2 \partial_{xx}

but i think that

\partial_{t}=\frac{\partial }{\partial e} \frac{\partial e}{\partial t}=-c\frac{\partial }{\partial e}

and

\partial_{x}=\frac{\partial }{\partial e} \frac{\partial e}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial }{\partial e}

then

\partial_{tt}- c^2 \partial_{xx}= c^2 \partial_{ee}- c^2 \partial_{ee}=0

what is the correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you are right. Indeed the general solution of the homogeneous wave equation in 1+1 dimensions is
f(t,x)=f_1(x-c t)+f_2(x+c t).
You come to this conclusion by the substitution
u_1=x-c t, \quad u_2=x+ c t
This gives through the chain rule
\partial_{u_1} \partial_{u_2}=\frac{1}{4}(\partial_x^2-\partial_t^2/c^2).
This means that you can write the wave equation
\left (\frac{1}{c^2} \partial_t^2-\partial_x^2 \right ) f=0.
as
\partial_{u_1} \partial_{u_2} f=0.
This is very easy to integrate successively. Integrating with respect to u_1 first gives
\partial_{u_2} f = \tilde{f}_2'(u_2)
and then
f=\tilde{f}_1(u_1)+\tilde{f}_2(u_2) = \tilde{f}_1(x-ct)+\tilde{f}_2(x+c t)
with two arbitrary functions that are at least two times differentiable with respect to their arguments.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top