Equations for cannon ball on a planet

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter putongren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Cannon Planet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving equations for a cannonball shot from a cannon on a planet, specifically exploring whether it would return to the surface of a circular planet. The scope includes theoretical considerations of projectile motion, escape velocity, and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in developing an equation for a cannonball shot from a cannon to determine if it would return to the surface of a circular planet.
  • Another participant suggests looking into "escape velocity" as a relevant concept.
  • There is a discussion about the initial and final states of potential and kinetic energy in the context of escape velocity calculations.
  • Some participants clarify that if the cannon is fired at a 90-degree angle, the ball will return to the ground unless its initial velocity exceeds escape velocity.
  • One participant proposes that the problem involves modifying standard projectile motion equations to account for a curved surface rather than a flat one.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to calculate the trajectory of the cannonball to determine where it would hit the planet's surface, suggesting that this requires developing mathematical equations for the flight path.
  • There is a contention regarding the relevance of escape velocity, with some arguing it is not the primary concern if the goal is to find where the cannonball lands.
  • One participant mentions that the trajectory can be analyzed using orbital mechanics, assuming a spherical planet without mass concentrations.
  • Another participant points out that the initial force vector is not a useful parameter, advocating for the use of initial velocity and position vectors instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of escape velocity to the problem at hand. While some focus on escape velocity as a key factor, others argue that the primary concern should be the trajectory and impact point of the cannonball. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations may depend on assumptions about the planet's shape, mass distribution, and the effects of atmospheric drag, which have not been fully addressed in the discussion.

putongren
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
I've been trying to develop a equation for a ball that is shot out of a cannon and see if it would return to the surface of a circular planet. This is not a homework. It's something that I have been thinking about for a long time. Can somewhat help out to derive such a formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried looking up "escape velocity"?
 
Please show your work so far.

Pedantic note: planets tend to be spherical rather than circular.
You are thinking of firing a cannot pointed along a great circle I guess... is the planet supposed to be rotating?
Or do you just want to see how the ballistic relations are modified in a circular coordinate system?

Less pedantic note - if you fire the cannon at 90deg elevation, then the ball falls back to ground unless the initial velocity is greater than the escape velocity.
 
Simon Bridge, I am aware of the escape velocity.

Is it:

PE(int) + KE(int) = PE(final) + KE(final)

and then solve for escape velocity, assuming PE(final) = 0, and KE(int) = 0?Simon, I guess I'm modifying the simple physics problem where we solve for distance and maximum height when given an initial force vector for the cannon ball. I modified the problem so the surface is not flat but curved and finite. I know how to obtain the equations that lead to solutions for the former problem. The new problem is a great deal harder.

My attempt at the problem:

We need to know the equation for the motion of the projectile in polar coordinates form, minus radius of the planet, and equate the other side of the equation to 0. So the equation of the problem would look something like:

0 = (term describing motion of cannon ball) - (radius of planet).
 
Last edited:
putongren said:
I've been trying to develop a equation for a ball that is shot out of a cannon and see if it would return to the surface of a circular planet.

putongren said:
Simon Bridge, I am aware of the escape velocity... I guess I'm modifying the simple physics problem where we solve for distance and maximum height when given an initial force vector for the cannon ball.

Are you trying to calculate IF the ball will return to the planet, or WHERE it will land? Simon and Bandersnatch mentioned escape velocity because if all you want to know is "will it fall back", that doesn't require launch direction or angle to calculate height and distance. Escape velocity will leave the planet in any direction, as long you don't aim at the ground.
 
putongren said:
Is it:

PE(int) + KE(int) = PE(final) + KE(final)

and then solve for escape velocity, assuming PE(final) = 0, and KE(int) = 0?
Where are you defining zero potential energy? A common convention is that PE is zero at infinity. Under that convention, PE is negative everywhere else.

Also, what are you taking as the "initial" and "final" states?
 
Hey all, I'm trying to determine IF and if yes, WHERE would it hit the planet's surface. Wouldn't that necessitate the development to mathematic equations of the flight path? You're right in that if I'm just interested in the question of IF, I just need to compute the escape velocity.

jbriggs444:
Initial states for PE is the cannon ball still on the surface of the planet, the final state for PE is at infinity. Initial state for KE is 0 because it is the instant where the cannon ball leaves the cannon and gaining velocity. The final KE state is when the cannon ball is at an arbitrary large distance form the surface.
 
Last edited:
putongren said:
Initial states for PE is the cannon ball still on the surface of the planet, the final state for PE is at infinity. Initial state for KE is 0 because it is the instant where the cannon ball leaves the cannon and gaining velocity. The final KE state is when the cannon ball is at an arbitrary large distance form the surface.
When the ball leaves the cannon, it will already have velocity and will then be losing velocity. The initial velocity will not be zero.


putongren said:
Simon Bridge, I am aware of the escape velocity.

Is it:

PE(int) + KE(int) = PE(final) + KE(final)

and then solve for escape velocity, assuming PE(final) = 0, and KE(int) = 0?

The velocity needed to "escape" is not a single velocity, it's a range of velocities. (If you go faster than "escape velocity" you will still escape.)

So when people say "escape velocity" they are typically talking about the minimum velocity needed to escape.


So, when solving for the minimum escape velocity, what can you say about KE(final)?
 
I don't know why everyone is talking about the escape velocity here, when clearly the original poster is referring to shots fired that will return to the surface somewhere.

As for what is required for the calculation of the trajectory? If you assume the planet is spherical and has no mass concentrations, it is simply orbital mechanics. Part of the orbit will be below the surface of the planet, but that doesn't actually change the calculations. Based on the initial velocity and angle, you can determine the orbital parameters. Once you know the orbit, you can find the two spots where it intersects the surface of the sphere. One of those points should be the location of the cannon, and the other will be the point of impact.
 
  • #10
"initial force vector" is not a useful parameter, you want the initial velocity and position vectors... but I see what you mean.

You want to look up "central force problem"[1] - this gets you general orbital equations.
To do ballistics with the orbital equations, you have to include the radius of the body - using the initial position as the planet radius and the place the projectile comes to land is where the orbit next intersects that radius.

More realistically, you need the radial equation for atmospheric drag as well.

----------------------

[1] See: Tan S M, http://home.comcast.net/~szemengtan/ClassicalMechanics/SingleParticle.pdf ch1.7 p1-12 for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K