Equilibrium of a rigid solid on a rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equilibrium of a rigid solid supported by a rod and influenced by a spring force at an angle. The problem involves analyzing forces and moments acting on the system, particularly focusing on the geometry and relationships between angles and lengths in the context of static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the assumptions regarding the angle of the spring force and its application point. There are discussions about the geometry of the setup, including the formation of right triangles and the implications of neglecting the pulley size. Some participants suggest considering extreme cases to better understand the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the assumptions made about the spring force and its angle. There is an exploration of the geometric relationships in the problem, and some guidance has been offered regarding the application of the Pythagorean theorem to the relevant triangles.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the relationship between the lengths of the sides in the triangles formed by the rod and the spring, as well as the assumption that the size of the pulley can be neglected. There is also a mention of the specific conditions under which the spring is unstretched.

Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
At the end ##B## of rod ##BC## a vertical load ##P## is applied. The spring constant is ##k## and it forms an angle ##\theta=0## when the spring is unstretched.

a) Neglecting the weight of the rod, express the angle ##\theta## corresponding to the equilibrium position in terms of ##P##, ##k## and ##l##. Sol: ##\theta =\arctan \dfrac{P}{kl}##

b) Determine the value of ##\theta## corresponding to equilibrium if ##P=2kl##. Sol: ##\theta =63,4\, \textrm{º}##
Relevant Equations
##F=k\Delta x##, ##\sum M_C=0##
Figure:
01A775DC-1539-4112-A597-3725BBBF9910.jpeg


Attempt at a Solution:
$$F=k\Delta x=lk\sin \theta$$
$$\delta x=0 \quad \textrm{when} \theta=0$$
305FD8AD-88F5-46A9-A1AC-66870EBD67E9.jpeg

$$\sum M_C=0\rightarrow$$
$$\rightarrow Pl\cos \theta -F_yl\cos \theta -F_xl\sin \theta =0\rightarrow$$
$$\rightarrow Pl\cos \theta -Fl\cos^2 \theta -Fl\sin^2 \theta=0\rightarrow$$
$$\rightarrow Pl\cos \theta -kl^2\sin \theta \cos^2 \theta -kl^2\sin^2 \theta =0\rightarrow$$
$$P\cos \theta =kl\sin \theta \cos^2 \theta -kl\sin^3 \theta =0\rightarrow$$
$$\dfrac{P}{kl}=\dfrac{\sin \theta \cos^2 \theta -\sin^3 \theta}{\cos \theta}\rightarrow \dfrac{P}{kl}=\tan \theta \dfrac{\cos^2 \theta -\sin^2 \theta}{\cos \theta}\rightarrow$$
$$\rightarrow \dfrac{P}{kl}=\dfrac{(\cos \theta +\sin \theta)(\cos \theta -\sin \theta)}{\cos \theta}\tan \theta =(1-\tan^2 \theta)\tan \theta$$
because
$$\left( \dfrac{\cos \theta}{\cos \theta}+\dfrac{\sin \theta}{\cos \theta}\right) \cdot \left( \dfrac{\cos \theta}{\cos \theta}-\dfrac{\sin \theta}{\cos \theta}\right) =(1+\tan)\cdot (1-\tan)=$$
$$=1-\tan +\tan -\tan^2 =1-\tan^2 \theta$$
I've tried this but I don't know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, you have assumed that the support force (##\vec{F}##) from the spring is applied at an angle of ##\theta## from the vertical. This means that ##\vec{F}## will be at right angles to the rod.

Can you justify that assumption?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
jbriggs444 said:
As I understand it, you have assumed that the support force (##\vec{F}##) from the spring is applied at an angle of ##\theta## from the vertical. This means that ##\vec{F}## will be at right angles to the rod.

Can you justify that assumption?
Yes, isn't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Yes, isn't it?
The length of the bar is ##l##, the horizontal distance between supports is also ##l##. Try to form that "right triangle", you will notice something suspicious.

Also: It should be stated we are to neglect the size of the pulley.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Guillem_dlc said:
Yes, isn't it?
It often helps to consider extreme cases. Sketch the diagram with ##\theta=90°##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
erobz said:
The length of the bar is ##l##, the horizontal distance between supports is also ##l##. Try to form that "right triangle", you will notice something suspicious.

Also: It should be stated we are to neglect the size of the pulley.
I don't quite understand what you mean
 
Guillem_dlc said:
I don't quite understand what you mean
What does the Pythagorean Theorem say about the lengths of sides in "right" triangles? Try applying it to triangle ##ABC##.
 
Guillem_dlc said:
I don't quite understand what you mean
The pulley size remark? Or the isosceles triangle part?

1667221696518.png
 

Attachments

  • 1667221644544.png
    1667221644544.png
    8 KB · Views: 113
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Guillem_dlc said:
Homework Statement:: At the end ##B## of rod ##BC## a vertical load ##P## is applied. The spring constant is ##k## and it forms an angle ##\theta=0## when the spring is unstretched.
When the spring is unstretched and ##\theta = 0##, points A and B are coincident (assuming that ##l## is much greater than the pulley radius). As the spring is stretched under the load, point ##B## describes a circle of radius ##l##. Triangle ACB is isosceles (##AC=BC##). What is length ##AB## in terms of ##\theta##? By how much does the spring stretch?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #10
Ok now I'll try again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K