Equilibrium Weight: Finding Balance for Art Project

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an art student's project involving a 2.5-meter-high stool for a sound art exhibition, emphasizing the importance of equilibrium and safety. The student seeks advice on the weight and circumference of a cement base to ensure stability while sitting on the stool. Responses highlight two main strategies for stability: lowering the center of mass with a heavy base or increasing the base area with a metal plate. The consensus leans towards using a sturdy metal plate, which allows for greater lean angles while maintaining balance. The student expresses gratitude for the input and mentions ongoing collaboration with peers to create the metal base.
naaaadia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,

I am an art student and need help for a project I am doing. I do performance art, and I realized time and time again that performance is all about physics. Especially in this case, because I am using my own body and my general safety is involved.

I have built a stool 2.5 meters high, 50 cm squared. I want to sit on this stool during a sound art exhibition. The work is about finding a state of equilibrium, as I will be a live addition to the exposition and add to the main composition of sound elements.

I weigh around 60 kilos. If I were to build a cement base for the stool how heavy would it have to be? And which circumfrence would it need to remain stable??

I am adding some pictures.

Another option would be to build the stool onto a metal plate that is 1.5 meters squared. Does anyone have another idea?

I would appreciate your help on this.

Thankyou, Nadia
 

Attachments

  • live_skulptur.jpg
    live_skulptur.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 414
  • stuhl.jpg
    stuhl.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 388
  • zweitevariation.jpg
    zweitevariation.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 407
Physics news on Phys.org
You will remain safely perched on the stool if the center of mass of you plus the stool plus the base remains above the area of the base.

I assume here you know what "center of mass" means. You should have an intuitive idea of the above rule based on your own experience- balancing on one foot while holding different poses, for example.

There's two approaches to increase the stability- one is it lower the center of mass, by making a really heavy base (that would be the cement). The other approach is to increase the area of the base- the metal plate.

Let's say the stool weighs 20 kilos, and let's say when you sit, your center of mass is centered on and located at the seat. This puts the center of mass of you plus the stool is located about 2.2 m off the floor- fairly high. This means if you lean 6.5 degrees off (the stool is 50 cm on a side), you will fall off.

If your cement base weighs as much as you, the COM is back down to 1.25 m, and a lean angle of 12 degrees is the limit. But then the stool weighs 80 kilos. Adding the metal plate (thick enough so it does not flex) instead means you can lean out about 20 degrees.

So, as long as the construction is sturdy, I would go with the metal plate. And be careful climing up and down the thing.
 
Welcome to PF!

naaaadia said:
… I want to sit on this stool during a sound art exhibition. The work is about finding a state of equilibrium, as I will be a live addition to the exposition and add to the main composition of sound elements.

I weigh around 60 kilos. If I were to build a cement base for the stool how heavy would it have to be? And which circumfrence would it need to remain stable??

Hi naaaadia ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

How about an egg-shape instead of a stool?

If the base was a shallow enough curve, it would wobble a bit but still return to equilibrium.

Shouldn't everything in a sound exhibition wobble a bit? :wink:

If the base was smooth enough, the person sitting inside the egg could even get it to spin. :biggrin:
 
thanks for your replies, the people at school are helping me make a metal plate, that is pretty heavy and around 1.5 meters squared.

but again thank you for your replies - i understand a little more.

an egg is a good idea too, but would be another performance, I'm the bird...

best regards,

nadia
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top