Equivalence between a Black Hole and travelling at the speed of light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the conceptual relationship between black holes and traveling at the speed of light, focusing on the behavior of light in these extreme conditions. Participants examine the implications of special and general relativity, particularly regarding the emission and perception of light from fast-moving objects and near black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether shining a flashlight while traveling at the speed of light or near a black hole would result in the emission of a light beam.
  • Another participant asserts that the premise violates the laws of physics, suggesting limited insight can be gained from the question.
  • A participant clarifies that if traveling near the speed of light or near a black hole in freefall, light would still be observed to travel at speed c locally.
  • Discussion includes the idea that there is no absolute notion of speed in relativity, and different frames of reference can lead to different interpretations of motion.
  • One participant introduces a thought experiment involving a train moving near the speed of light and questions how light emitted in the direction of travel would be perceived by observers in different frames.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the addition of velocities in relativity is not straightforward and questions whether the original inquiry implies that particles moving at the speed of light are akin to black holes.
  • Participants discuss the effects of Lorentz transformations on rulers and clocks in different frames, noting that each observer perceives the other's measurements as distorted.
  • There is a mention of the Doppler effect and its impact on the perception of light's wavelength and propagation speed in different frames.
  • A later reply connects the discussion to general relativity, questioning whether space warping near massive objects like black holes leads to similar effects as those observed in special relativity.
  • One participant suggests that a large black hole with negligible tidal forces at the event horizon could be analogous to an accelerating observer in flat spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the relationship between black holes and relativistic speeds, with no consensus on the implications of these concepts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the equivalence of experiences near black holes and at relativistic speeds.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of relativistic effects, including time dilation and length contraction, and the dependence on the observer's frame of reference. There are unresolved questions about the nature of light emission and perception in extreme conditions.

  • #61
OK, let's simplify things. Instead of talking about measuring an emitted frequency let's only talk about emitting or receiving a frequency. Let's stipulate that you can perfectly determine the emitted frequency (e.g. using an ideal clock and an ideal waveform synthesizer) and that you can perfectly determine the received frequency (e.g. with an ideal noise free detector and an ideal clock).

Can you re-ask your question in those terms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
DaleSpam said:
OK, let's simplify things. Instead of talking about measuring an emitted frequency let's only talk about emitting or receiving a frequency. Let's stipulate that you can perfectly determine the emitted frequency (e.g. using an ideal clock and an ideal waveform synthesizer) and that you can perfectly determine the received frequency (e.g. with an ideal noise free detector and an ideal clock).

Can you re-ask your question in those terms.

Hi DaleSpam. Thanks for your attempts to help me. My interest is in cosmology and I was seeking a simple UNCOMPLICATED answer about emission from these masses and the gravitational potential within which the occur. The conclusions regarding galactic rotation curves etc made from observations still don't make sense to me, but I have decided to back off from trying to extract a "rule of thumb" regarding how GR affects our observations. As you say, we seem to be going in circles. I thank you for your patience. Regards. Pierre.
 
  • #63
Pierre007080 said:
Hi DaleSpam. Thanks for your attempts to help me. My interest is in cosmology and I was seeking a simple UNCOMPLICATED answer about emission from these masses and the gravitational potential within which the occur. The conclusions regarding galactic rotation curves etc made from observations still don't make sense to me, but I have decided to back off from trying to extract a "rule of thumb" regarding how GR affects our observations. As you say, we seem to be going in circles. I thank you for your patience. Regards. Pierre.
You are quite welcome. For an uncomplicated answer I would just stick with post #35, everything else is just window-dressing and confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K