Equivalence Principle Explained - What is it?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Equivalence Principle, exploring its implications in different gravitational contexts, particularly in free-fall scenarios versus being in outer space. Participants examine the effects of gravitational and Doppler shifts on light in these situations, as well as the conditions under which the Equivalence Principle holds true.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Equivalence Principle implies that experiments conducted in free-fall cannot distinguish between being in free-fall and being in outer space.
  • Others propose that while local experiments may not reveal differences, distant observers can measure effects such as Doppler shifts and gravitational shifts.
  • A participant questions the locality of the principle, suggesting that specific conditions, such as the behavior of gas in a free-fall scenario, could affect the observed shifts.
  • It is noted that in a uniform gravitational field, a freely falling observer would not perceive any redshift, while falling towards a massive body might introduce complexities.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of tidal effects, suggesting that a non-uniform gravitational field could lead to discrepancies in measurements, such as atomic clocks being out of sync.
  • There is a reiteration that the Equivalence Principle is applicable primarily in uniform fields, and non-uniform fields introduce additional factors that complicate its application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the Equivalence Principle and its application, particularly regarding uniform versus non-uniform gravitational fields. There is no consensus on the implications of tidal effects or the specific conditions necessary for the principle to hold.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the Equivalence Principle, particularly regarding the assumptions about uniformity in gravitational fields and the effects of local versus distant observations.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
The Equivalence principle says or at least this is what i learned , Is that being in free-fall is the same as being out in space , But in free fall if you shined a laser up it would get Doppler shifted and gravitationally red shifted but out in space it would not . Or do i have something wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equivalence principle says that in a local region around you (the "laboratory") you cannot perform an experiment that tells you whether you are in outer space or free fall in a gravitational potential. Far away from your laboratory others can certainly determine a difference. Those others would be the ones measuring your Doppler shift and gravitational shifts or lack thereof.

You with your laser would not be able to tell which was the case.
 
Last edited:
how local are we talking , because let's say I had some gas of neon or whatever and then I was shining my laser at , but I had the frequency specific enough to where if it was red shifted it would not absorb the photon. But now that i think about it when the photon is red-shifted from my falling elevator , the neon gas is moving towards the light so the blue-shift would cancel the redshift . But then we still have the gravitational red-shift but from the time the light was emitted the elevator has picked up speed so the increased speed might cancel the gravitational red-shift.
 
If the free fall is in a uniform gravitational field, then, there will be no red shift according to the freely falling observer.
 
so it has to be in a uniform field. Like falling towards Earth would no work , what about the Doppler shift .
 
You need to be more specific about your thought experiment. If you are in free-fall within a tank of the gas which is free-falling with you then you won't see any effect.

If you are free falling through the gas then the gas is not in free fall (it is kept from it via a pressure gradient like we have in our own atmosphere) and the EP implies you'd see the same light interaction as if you were in space within a wind tunnel which was accelerating the gas.

Remember to apply the EP you must speak of nearby gas interactions. There are still tidal effects which distinguish falling a central gravitational potential vs floating in free space.

Finally also remember that the equivalence principle is used in GR when deriving the gravitational red & blue shifts so they will be consistent with it (if GR is correct).
 
Ok if i was in free-fall , The gravitational field would be slightly stronger at my feet than at my head . So if i have to atomic clocks one at my feet and one at my head and i am in free-fall the clocks would get a little bit out of sync . Or is this not ok to use special consequences of GR to disprove the EP.
 
cragar said:
Ok if i was in free-fall , The gravitational field would be slightly stronger at my feet than at my head . So if i have to atomic clocks one at my feet and one at my head and i am in free-fall the clocks would get a little bit out of sync . Or is this not ok to use special consequences of GR to disprove the EP.

This is what is referred to as "tidal effects". The gravitational field you are describing is non-uniform.
 
ok so it has to be uniform to apply the EP.
thanks for all of your guys responses by the way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K