Equivalent capacitance homework problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equivalent capacitance between points A and B in a circuit involving multiple capacitors. The problem includes capacitors with values of 3μF, 5μF, 4μF, and 2μF, and participants are trying to understand the configuration and relationships between these components.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the arrangement of capacitors, questioning whether they are in series or parallel. There are attempts to clarify the identification of nodes and the implications of the circuit's topology.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the circuit layout. Some guidance has been offered regarding the identification of nodes and the nature of the bridge circuit, but there is no explicit consensus on the solution approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the circuit may be a bridge configuration, which complicates the application of standard series and parallel reduction methods. There is mention of the need to redraw the circuit to better understand its symmetry and potential simplifications.

  • #61
gracy said:
But then I get confused which one will be denominator and which one will be numerator.
It doesn't matter which should be numerator or denominator. Just pick any ratio on one side, use the same on the other side.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Let say if I would have taken
C1/C2=C4/C3
After putting the values
I could have thought the bridge is not balanced.
 
  • #63
gracy said:
But then I get confused which one will be denominator and which one will be numerator.
You want to see if the two voltage dividers in the bridge circuit will produce the same voltage division. So a simple procedure is to make ratios of the components that make up each voltage divider. Compare the ratios. You can't go wrong if you select corresponding pairs (use symmetry and common sense).
 
  • #64
gneill said:
You can't go wrong if you select corresponding pairs (
You mean if I have selected C1 as numerator for one potential divider I shall select the one which is adjacent to it but at the other side of bridge as numerator of second potential divider,Right?
 
  • #65
gracy said:
Let say if I would have taken
C1/C2=C4/C3
After putting the values
I could have thought the bridge is not balanced.
You can call the two resistors on one side as 'upper' and 'lower'. So, upper/loewer on one side=upper/lower on the other side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
  • #66
cnh1995 said:
You can call the two resistors on one side as 'upper' and 'lower'. So, upper/loewer on one side=upper/lower on the other side.
Its just a memory trick..To understand the bridge balance conceptually, you should analyse it using voltage divider.
 
  • #67
logspot.com%2F-jehPxcGkMYs%2FTfgZWoCbTII%2FAAAAAAAAAQY%2F4eEQrl6bCcQ%2Fs1600%2Fbridge%2Bresistor.gif


upper/lower on one side=upper/lower on the other side.And if bridge is of this sort
proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tfd.com%2Fggse%2F4c%2Fgsed_0001_0017_0_img4261.png

upper left/upper right on one side=lower left/lower right on the other side
 
  • #68
gracy said:
logspot.com%2F-jehPxcGkMYs%2FTfgZWoCbTII%2FAAAAAAAAAQY%2F4eEQrl6bCcQ%2Fs1600%2Fbridge%2Bresistor.gif


upper/lower on one side=upper/lower on the other side.And if bridge is of this sort
proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tfd.com%2Fggse%2F4c%2Fgsed_0001_0017_0_img4261.png

upper left/upper right on one side=lower left/lower right on the other side
Right. Once you're fluent, you won't need this trick.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
8K
Replies
108
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K