Equivalent Resistance Calculation for Resistors in a Circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent resistance between points A and B in a circuit with six resistors: R1 = 4.8 Ohms, R2 = 2.5 Ohms, R3 = 3.7 Ohms, R4 = 4.4 Ohms, R5 = 4.1 Ohms, and R6 = 6.4 Ohms. The correct approach involves calculating R345 (the equivalent resistance of R3, R4, and R5 in parallel) as 1.349 Ohms, then adding R6 in series to get R3456 = 7.749 Ohms. Finally, R12 (the equivalent resistance of R1 and R2 in parallel) is calculated as 1.644 Ohms, which must be combined with R3456 in parallel to find the total equivalent resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and basic circuit theory
  • Knowledge of series and parallel resistor combinations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving fractions and reciprocals
  • Familiarity with electrical resistance units (Ohms)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn advanced techniques for calculating equivalent resistance in complex circuits
  • Study Kirchhoff's laws for circuit analysis
  • Explore simulation tools like LTspice for visualizing circuit behavior
  • Investigate the impact of resistor tolerances on equivalent resistance calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, hobbyists building circuits, and anyone needing to understand resistor combinations in electrical circuits.

cjames9001
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the equivalent resistance between points A and B shown in the figure . Consider R1 = 4.8 Ohms, R2 = 2.5 Ohms, R3 = 3.7 Ohms, R4 = 4.4 Ohms, R5 = 4.1 Ohms, and R6 = 6.4 Ohms.

Homework Equations



1caa164cf16b7117e9f88a2bf910a391.png

0f67a9d6ad548b23212a3161ebabcf51.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I got 9.33 by adding resistors 3,4,5 in parallel [1/(1/R3+1/R4+1/R5)] and added that to R6 which is in series with the equivalent of 3,4,5 and I added 1,2 In parallel [1/(1/R1+1/R2)]. My question is that obviously I am not combing the right resistors as parallel or series, can someone help me on this? I have also tried the equivalent of 3,4,5 in parallel and adding that to the equivalent of 1,2,6 in parallel which I believe is about 2.66 anyways I've tried a few other combinations as well and cannot seem to figure out which ones I am supposedto add in parallel and which ones to add in series

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 5416321069_49.jpg
    5416321069_49.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 1,383
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks okay, but I'd check your math.

First, you found an equivalent resistance for R's 3, 4, & 5 which are in parallel. Let's call that R345. What value did you get?

Then you added R345 in series with R6 and got 9.33Ω. Call that R3456. That seems a bit high to me.

Perhaps you should lay out your calculations here and we can see what's going on.
 
The 9.33 I Got was the final answer.

This is what I did:

First R345=[1/(1/R3+1/R4+1/R5)]=[1/0.7414]=1.349 Ohms

Then I took R6= 6.4 Ohms and added it to 1.349 to get 7.749 Ohms

Then I Got R12=[1/(1/R1+1/R2)]=[1/0.608]=1.644 Ohms

Lastly I added 1.644 Ohms to 7.749 And got 9.39 Actually, Sorry.
 
cjames9001 said:
The 9.33 I Got was the final answer.

This is what I did:

First R345=[1/(1/R3+1/R4+1/R5)]=[1/0.7414]=1.349 Ohms

Then I took R6= 6.4 Ohms and added it to 1.349 to get 7.749 Ohms

Then I Got R12=[1/(1/R1+1/R2)]=[1/0.608]=1.644 Ohms

Excellent up to here.

Lastly I added 1.644 Ohms to 7.749 And got 9.39 Actually, Sorry.

Oops. The last two resistors (R12 and R3456) are in parallel, not series.

Actually, the value for R3465 is in parallel with R1 and R2, so you could find the final result from there by doing the parallel calculation on the three.
 
Ok, That worked, I'm a little confused as to why getting R3456 Is Parallel to R12? and Why wouldn't getting R126 And Adding it In series to R345 doesn't work? Thanks for your help so far by the way
 
Draw a picture with R1, R2, and R3456. You'll see that all three are in parallel (they all have their ends connected to node A and node B).
 
Ok I see what you mean, Thanks Again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K